Pathways chapter #14: Tarot

Featured

 After perusing numbers of books on Tarot, we settled on Tarot for Beginners, by Meg Hayertz, published by Althea Press in 2018. The following is a brief summary of Meg Hayertz’s book.

Ms. Hayertz received her first tarot card reading in Portland, Oregon, at a psychic fair at the age of 19. And due to some issues in her life, she found that the reading helped calm her, which then resulted in wanting more.

 Kent reports: I recall a similar kind of fair in Berkeley some years back and another one in San Francisco later on. Though a Christian at the time, I was stunned if not overwhelmed by the spiritual power I witnessed. If it had not been for my Christianity, I might well have been attracted to that which is psychic.

 Still in the introduction, Hayertz says it is not enough that the cards shine a light on what goes on in a person’s heart and mind; this must be put into action. “I suggest we use the 78 archetypes of the tarot to empower ourselves to become more loving and free” (p. IX). And to this end, she dedicates her book.

The origin of the word Tarot goes back to the mid-15th century. In various parts of Europe games such as Italian tarocchini, French tarot, and Austrian Königrufen were popular, and the general term tarot attached itself to what became the present-day tarot. 

Part 1: Tarot Then & Now

The origins of the tarot are murky, but they are cards, 78 of them, divided between Major and Minor Arcana. The Minor Arcana are much like the standard deck of 52 cards but instead of spades, clubs, hearts, and diamonds, there are cups, pentacles, swords, and wands, but with four additional cards. The Major Arcana contain 22 cards, four of which are The Empress, The Hermit, The Fool, and the Devil. Each of the cards have several meanings that can be attached to them depending upon the reader.

The author states that when Napoleon brought back artifacts from Egypt to Europe, there grew an interest in divination. In 1887, A. E. Waite, a member of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, developed occult symbolic systems around divination and astrology, which in time became related to the tarot. He then asked an artist, Pamela Colman Smith, to create a deck of tarot cards using symbols that were known at the time. This deck was published by William Rider & Sons, of London, in 1910. 

The author claims that reading tarot cards can reveal one’s potential future, and rightly evaluate one’s present circumstances, help with making decisions, help one to understand life, plus develop self-knowledge, intuition, and creativity. 

Tarot is a form of divination, a magical technique, not scientific, for gaining knowledge about the unknown and the future. And as a form of divination, it is condemned in Deuteronomy 18, verses 9–12: 

[9] “When you come into the land that the LORD your God is giving you, you shall not learn to follow the abominable practices of those nations. [10] There shall not be found among you anyone who burns his son or his daughter as an offering, anyone who practices divination or tells fortunes or interprets omens, or a sorcerer [11] or a charmer or a medium or a necromancer or one who inquires of the dead, (ESV) 

Hayertz states that divination is a form of magic as well as most forms of meditation, “since a meditation practice can bring self-knowledge and spiritual knowledge from beyond our rational mind” (p. 7). She wants to dismiss the idea that there is a divide between the magical, or divine, and the ordinary, thus making tarot divination ordinary and common. 

In regard to the two major divisions of a tarot deck, the Major Arcana and the Minor Arcana (Arcana means mystery), which come from Catholicism and Judaism, as well as Greek and Egyptian mythology, she notes the Major Arcana reflects Gnostic, Catholic, and Pagan imagery. There are also many spiritual traditions that have come to be associated with the cards, such as astrology, Kabbalah, numerology, and alchemy, as well as still more spiritual traditions that have found parallels and connections with the tarot, including crystal healing and Ayurveda (the traditional system of medicine in India) (p. 7). 

It is clear then that our author places tarot solidly amongst occultic practices.

Part 2 Tarot Mechanics 

Tarot card reading fits clearly into what is known in the occult world as divination. The cards are used to answer questions about the past, present, and future, and it is said that tarot is an opening into one’s spiritual self.

The first step for a person who wants to do tarot is to select a deck. Meg uses the Rider-Waite-Smith deck, otherwise known as RWS, but there are many others. And before making the first reading one must both purify and attune to the deck. Once readings begin, the deck must be cared for by keeping it clean and cleared of extraneous energy. 

Here in the process of purifying and attuning the deck reveals the occultic, New Age, divination, fortune telling nature of tarot. 

A deck can be purified by placing the deck on a “windowsill or outside during a full moon.” Or, one can bury the deck in salt for a few days, but in a plastic bag so that the salt does not touch the deck. 

Alternately, sage or a smudge stick can be burned while the deck is held in the smoke. Another way to purify the deck is to put the 78 cards in order, first the Fool (O) then on until the Word card (XXI), then observe through that suit all the way to the King of each suit. Once the deck is in order, it must be reshuffled. 

Attuning is the next step, and it means forming a connection with the deck—in other words, attuning to it. This means treating the deck with respect and trust. It takes a week to attune to the deck, gazing at the images on the cards to determine if there is any intuitive sensing—emotional, mental, or spiritual connections that come up. 

The deck must be cleansed regularly, as the deck can pick up unwanted energy from previous readings. There are two rituals that can be performed. One, shuffle the deck rhythmically and tap the deck on the table in order to release any extra energy. Two, fan the deck out in your hand, blow softly on the edges, and with the whole deck knock once on the top of the deck. 

It is this purifying and attuning process that brings the one selecting a tarot deck into a spiritual arena, and this is an evil arena. Indeed, this is the door opening to the demonic realm. This need not be a terrifying experience at all, but a change has occurred—a new and amazing ‘spiritual’ life and experience comes to life. And these supernatural experiences are real and not imagined. In fact, they can be quite exhilarating and captivating. 

There is a definite procedure to begin a reading; one needs to prepare a space and deck. Some tarot readers will create an altar where are placed the reader’s personal spiritual items. In any case, one needs to turn off phones, light a candle, play some music, and then invite the guidance of any higher power in. Be open then to any wisdom or insight that might be communicated in the reading of the cards. 

From six to ten minutes before beginning a reading for oneself, quietly focus the breathing and/or visualize a beam of light entering through the top of the head, which will fill the body with light. 

When one is in the right spiritual state of mind, one asks a question, but the tarot does not answer back with any direct answer. Instead, the reader, as he or she examines the cards, will relate ideas and events and reveal areas needing growth. The future is never spelled out in terms of certainty. 

On page 14 and 15, Meg Hayertz writes about Tarot Symbolism and states that symbols found on tarot cards come from a variety of sources. The version she is speaking to is the Rider-Waite-Smith deck, or RWS. 

The first is Christian mythology. Adam and Eve are depicted many times, and there is the Devil and the snake of Genesis chapter 3. There are images of a church, the pope, two monks, and more. 

The second is Egyptian mythology, or more accurately the European interpretation of Egyptian mythology. 

The third is source is from Kabbalah, a Judaist offshoot. 

Each sign of the zodiac is also found amongst the cards. 

Interpreting the cards takes practice, the author states. As we read through materials on tarot, it seems apparent that any counsel or direction from an intuitive framework could result in almost anything. (Toward the end of this chapter are some statements found on interpretation of the cards, mainly focused on intuition.) 

Our author claims there is both an intellectual and an intuitive side to determining what the cards are saying to the reader or to the one who is consulting the tarot reader. There is an opening of “your intuitive associations sparked by the cards.” Then, “note how your associations and intuitive messages match up with the meanings of the cards.” Third, note how the cards’ symbolism matches up with one’s experiences. Last, consider what actions one should then take. 

The author next moves on to which spiritual practices are connected with or are tied to tarot card reading. These are Astrology, Kabbalah, Numerology, Rosicrucianism, and Alchemy. (Our view is that there are many other spiritual/ occult practices that could be included here.) And each of these fit snuggly into and are recognized as occult practices. 

This association is an eye opener, as tarot is placed among very direct forms of the occult (pages 16 and 17). During long years of casting demons out of people, so many of them attracted demons into themselves by means of the occult. This is not child’s play nor adult play but is extremely serious. We are reminded of a most important verse at this point, 1 Peter 5:8, since this is what is going on in our world today with the wide open and public embracing of the occult arts, of which tarot is only one among many: 

Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour. 

In chapter 3 of part 1, the author begins to explain how one decides what the card spread means. One card, two cards, three cards, or more are pulled from the deck and spread out. Then the reader considers the meanings of the cards and how it all applies to him or herself, or to the one for whom the reading is being done. 

After examining this material, it is obvious to us that a reader could interpret the cards in many different ways. There is no concrete counsel, no clear solving of a dilemma, nor help with making a decision. It seems that a professional tarot card reader could bend the reading to just about anything, including flattering or messages that the “client” was clearly hoping for. There is obviously much room here for deception. 

Yet this is not the very worst outcome, which is giving oneself, however unwittingly, to an occult practice, which is animated and realized by demonic power. And the outcome of this is nothing less than judgment and an eternity in hell. Is it worth that? 

Chapter 4, part 1, is titled “Growing From the Tarot.” No comment is needed on part 2 of the book by Meg Hayertz, as it only presents each of the cards, the Major and Minor Arcana, and possible meanings for each. 

She begins this section by saying, “I use the cards to help my clients.” 

We completely believe her. Based on what we have encountered with psychics of many different persuasions, very few of them are aware of the evil nature of their work and do not care one way or the other. Either that, or they fear the loss of income, or are afraid of being tormented should they turn from their practices. 

Yes, Meg is probably sincere when she says for her clients that she wants to “unlock creative blocks, deepen their inspiration, and become more aware of issues and values that underlie their personal lives and creative work” (p. 62). 

To read tarot cards is simply to meditate on the cards “to see what feelings, associations, and narratives arise. Then, we match the experiences that arose during meditation to the definitions of the cards” (p. 63). 

Using only a broad-brush stroke to report on this process, it begins with “Connecting with our Intuition.” 

Intuition: this word can be so difficult to define, but after encountering it hundreds of times, it is apparent to us that it involves impressions that come to one while engaging in the process, and this process is usually meditation and focus of one’s breath or something else linked to gaining a state of so-called mindlessness. 

The term used here is “meditative inquiry into your inner life.” When this is achieved, then Meg says one is to “sit with what arises and open to it” (p. 64). Meg then concludes this part with, “This first step is noticing and illuminating our experience and connecting with our intuition.”  

We wonder, whatever in the world does that mean? 

The next step is to select a card or cards from the tarot deck, lay the card or cards down in front of you and meditate on these. One must look at the artwork, note the name of the card, like “The Emperor,” consider it’s also-known-as name, in this case the Grandfather, then note the keywords, in this case, Reliability, Fatherhood, and Responsibility, the element associated with it, here Fire, and astrological sign, here Aries, and then numerology, in this case 4. 

These clues or cues, which may be the right word here, are to be meditated upon. If there is more than one card spread out, then think about what might be at play between the cards. Then one can ask oneself questions such as, “Do the dynamics between the cards feel tense? Or, what are the relative ages of the figures in the cards? Or, are they facing each other? Or, what are the cards’ similarities and differences? 

The next major step is “Integrating intuition with conscious awareness.” Something is then stirring in one’s mind, and the goal here is coming to a place of understanding. And it is here when meditation is core so that the meaning of the cards comes into one’s awareness. 

We must say that the process described to grasp the message of the cards is very elusive, fanciful, lacking substance, and unrealistic. It could yield almost anything. 

Meg describes how it is that one integrates insight brought by the card reading into action. Mainly, this happens by reliance upon your intuitive sense. 

Finally, by means of meditation, envision yourself entering the card or spread. Ask a character therein, like The Emperor, if that is the card drawn for the deck, for guidance regarding action. Allow “the words or gift they offer you to intuitively come to you” (p. 68). If things are not clear, one should ask their intuition for assistance and illumination. 

Again, let the participant beware of invoking unintended spirits by “asking a character therein, like The Emperor, for guidance.” 

Closing thoughts 

Using words like intuition and meditation is deceitful. It should be evil spirit or demon instead of intuition. It should be connecting with the demonic rather than meditation. However lighthearted this tarot card reading business is presented, it is merely a cheap disguise for a course on how to become demon possessed. 

Excerpts from Wikipedia 

Intuition is the ability to acquire knowledge without recourse to conscious reasoning. Different fields use the word “intuition” in very different ways, including but not limited to: direct access to unconscious knowledge; unconscious cognition; inner sensing; inner insight to unconscious pattern-recognition; and the ability to understand something instinctively, without any need for conscious reasoning. July 9, 2022 

The word intuition comes from the Latin verb intueri, translated as “consider” or from the late middle English word intuit, “to contemplate.” July 2, 2022

Meghan Rose, a spiritual advisor and tarot reader, defines intuition as “the ability to understand something without rational or conscious reasoning.” So, in the context of tarot cards, the reader, who could be a professional or yourself if you’re reading your own cards, receives intuitive messages from the cards that they won’t be able to explain with logic. They just know. And because we all have intuitive superpowers, honing your intuitive tarot skills is totally possible with a bit of practice. 

The tarot (/ˈtæroʊ/, first known as trionfi and later as tarocchi or tarock) is a pack of playing cards, used from at least the mid-15th century in various parts of Europe to play games such as Italian tarocchini, French tarot and Austrian Königrufen, many of which are still played today. In the late 18th century, some tarot decks began to be used for divination via tarot card reading and cartomancy reading to custom decks developed for such occult purposes. 

Tarot card reading is a form of cartomancy whereby practitioners use tarot cards purportedly to gain insight into the past, present or future. They formulate a question, then draw cards to interpret them for this end. June 26, 2018 

Tarot cards are a form of divination, which literally means working with the divine, or your higher self, which is the ultimate purpose of tarot cards, just like yoga. June 26, 2018

May 27, 2012

Dear Don,

Without your support I would have left the baseball program at San Quentin years ago. Now in, what would have been my 17th season, I must resign from the program. And without you there would not have been the incredibly great sports programs enjoyed at the prison. Thank you for all you have done.

            Let me express why I am leaving. One, in 2010 we decided, at the close of that season, to add one team–the A’s. After contacting the Oakland A’s they supplied us with uniforms and we were off and running. I invited a particular coach to manage the A’s, but he consistently, and again this 2012 season, essentially turned it over to a convict to run. Yes, two other coaches that I brought into work with the A’s in 2011 ran into some significant trouble, resulting in a player being transferred to another institution, but that 2011 season, due to the problem coaches and the inattention of the manager of the A’s, resulted in a miserable season for all concerned. The rivalry and tension was suffocating at times, and few felt good about the season.

            I was forced out the prison in late July of 2011 due to threats made on me. The most interesting accusation against me was “reverse” racism due to the fact that a high percentage of the Giants were black; the “white boys” on the A’s did not appreciate this.

            In a meeting with the CDW, Chief Deputy Warden, sometime later where I was assured that the problem was taken care of, but it was not. it got worse.

            Also, for 2012, we made format changes designed to correct the problems from the previous season, but as it turned out, that plan failed. Then more threats were made against me and one other coach, meetings were held in the CDW’s office, where I had to endure what could only be described as a “thug/bully” talking to, without even one sentence spoken by me or a moment when I was given a chance to speak. This occurred not once but three times, each of which you were present for.  After the Investigative Unit finished their report, I was removed from the prison along with the two problem A’s coaches. At no time, despite my thirty years of volunteer work at the prison, was I ever personally interviewed, except for a brief telephone conversation. I have never had a chance to even ask what it was that I was being punished for.

            At a meeting with the chief people running the two baseball teams on May 25, I was pressured into allowing certain problem people, three of whom had been involved with the problem mentioned above, to remain in the baseball program. (At least one of these should have been transferred to another prison.) And then, on Saturday, May 26, when the names of those selected for the A’s and the Giant’s was read off, the problem coach for the  A’s handed the job of running the team to the convict who was behind so much of the mischief.

            This last reason was enough for me. The program was not safe for anyone; the convicts were running the A’s team once again.

Then, on May 27 then I received a letter of resignation from the one coach without whom the program could not go on, the co-manager of the Giants, my good friend, who, citing safety concerns, decided enough was enough.

            Here is the bottom line on this sad affair: The CDW so managed the situation that the baseball program was made unsafe. Don, you did your best to dissuade him, but due to his “thug/bully” means of dealing with prison staff and volunteers, there was little you could do.

            Below is a copy of the email I sent out to the managers of the teams so far scheduled to come into the prison in 2012. It was my duty to let them know this. There were virtually no coaches left to run two teams, two practices a week and two games against outside teams per week. There was no other choice.

 Hello Everyone,

A sad time for me, and for you and your players: there will be no season at the prison this year. I am hoping that, after the dust settles, that we will have a 2013 season. Let me tell you, in a greatly abbreviated form however, what brought us to this point.

One, considerable trouble among our coaches (How’s that for brief?)

Two, utterly unsafe conditions. Some months ago, West Block went general population, that is, mainline prisoners, 800 plus of them, occupied the block. Due to budget concerns, these Level 3 convicts, by the stroke of an administration pen, became Level 2. This meant they were all eligible to come down on the yard and participate in the sports programs. My first sight of them was when I went with my son Vernon, who runs the flag football program, to observe two games. One look and I could see that everything had changed. Young, aggressive, three race groups, white (looked like the Hell’s Angel’s rejects due to being too rowdy), blacks, and Hispanics, all ganged up and looking to figure out who was going to call the shots, deal the dope, and control some rather unsavory realities of prison life.

I cannot, after what has happened in the last few days, justify inviting anyone into the prison right now. There will be those who will disagree with me, but I have to act according to my conscience. I have done the inviting and the scheduling, so the burden is on me. I am aware that there would be those who would push for the season to move along anyway, but it is my view that this is not only impossible but dangerous. The final decision was made clear to me this morning when I got a letter of resignation from the coach I have been working with for years, we actually have coached the Giants together for the last two years, and he cited safety concerns.

So there we are. Perhaps there will be a 2013 season, but things have to shake out so we can see what kind of adjustments are made. Word I have it is that it takes a year or so before the hierarchy is established and the pecking order made plain.

Thank you for being willing to come in and play our guys.

Kent Philpott

Don, I am sorry it came to this. You did you best and none of this is any fault of your own. When the program came under the purview of the CDW, for whatever reasons, he micro-managed it to its demise. All the promises he made to make things safe on the lower yard not only did not work but made things worse. Now my son to a lesser degree, but myself for sure, have to be concerned about what it might mean to have a prison gang thinking who knows what.

On my wall are a couple photos of you and I on the yard at opening days. I will not forget you. Thank you for all you did.

Kent Philpott

Hello, here is the end piece about Baptists, and this one with the impact of the Puritans on Christianity in England. Dr. Haykin wrote a brief piece on the connection between the Puritans and the Baptists in England. It is not wrong to state that the early church, prior to the early 300s AD, could be identified with baptist views. I am not stating that the Baptists are the best, only correct ones Biblically, I mean no one is perfect or right-on, but us Baptists do attempt to stick to the New Testament configurations of what the early Christians looked like and believed. Kent 

P.S. not sure what will be coming next on Wednesdays. Kent

Article by              Michael A.G. Haykin         Professor, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary

Baptists were birthed in the matrix of Puritanism, that sixteenth- and seventeenth-century movement of reform and renewal. The genesis of Puritanism between the 1560s and the 1580s was deeply intertwined with questions of worship and polity. In fact, Puritanism, in its various ecclesial manifestations, was confident that there was a blueprint for polity and worship in the New Testament. As we will see, these concerns were bequeathed to their Baptist offspring.

‘Apostolic Primitive Purity’

Baptists began their existence in the first half of the seventeenth century — the General (Arminian) Baptists emerging in the 1610s and the Particular (Calvinistic) Baptists appearing some 25 years later — with a passion for going back to the apostolic model that they believed was taught in the Scriptures.

One of the major architects of the Particular Baptist cause, William Kiffen (1616–1701), explained in 1681 why he became a Baptist in the late 1630s/early 1640s:

[I] concluded that the safest way [for me spiritually] was to follow the footsteps of the flock (namely that order laid down by Christ and his Apostles, and practiced by the primitive Christians in their times) which I found to be that after conversion they were baptized, added to the church, and continued in the apostles’ doctrine, fellowship, breaking of bread, and prayer; according to which I thought myself bound to be conformable.1

In other words, Kiffen became a Baptist because he was convinced that believer’s baptism and congregational church governance were indisputably part of the blueprint of New Testament polity.

Ten years later, Hercules Collins (d. 1702), a key Baptist leader in London, made the exact same point in a polemical piece on baptism when he stated that his intent was “to display this sacrament in its Apostolic primitive purity, free from the adulterations of men.”2 In fact, he asserted, it would violate his conscience were he to baptize an infant.3

The Believer’s ‘Great Pattern’

Given the uniqueness of believer’s baptism on the ecclesial scene of Stuart England — of the various church groups, only the Baptists restricted baptism to believers — it is not surprising that they had to defend the biblical legitimacy of their position time and again in this era. One scholar reckons the number of tracts and treatises written on this subject during the seventeenth century to be more than a hundred.4

“In being baptized as believers, Christians are following the example of Christ, their ‘great pattern.’”

One of the most popular of these tracts was John Norcott’s (d. 1676) Baptism Discovered Plainly & Faithfully, According to the Word of God (1672). In the relatively small compass of 56 pages, Norcott’s tract sets forth the standard seventeenth-century Baptist positions on the proper subjects of baptism (believers), the correct mode (immersion), and the meaning of baptism (primarily identification with Christ in his death, burial, and resurrection).5 Among his arguments in favor of believer’s baptism is his emphasis that in being baptized as believers, Christians are following the example of Christ, their “great pattern.” 

Going Yard

Doug MacKenzie

“When we go into the prison, you’ll definitely feel some anxiety.”  The prophecy came from Bob, our manager for the doubleheader against the San Quentin inmate baseball team, when I’d first contacted him two months prior to joining his squad.

I knew he was right.  But I decided to get an early start and let the anxiety build as soon as I committed to play.

Two months is a long time to let my imagination work.  Much too long.

As expected, visions of being cornered in the yard after getting separated from the group worked their way into my head.  Of somehow ticking-off the wrong guy on the opposing team.  Of ending up on the wrong end of the shiv that the first baseman snuck into the game. 

One link bound them all—I returned home maimed or worse in each one.

I’d heard the warnings.  Once we hit the yard, we’d be subjected to a wave of trash talk and thrown expletives.  I didn’t even know the proper prison protocol for a visitor.  Smack talk back?  It might get me some respect.  Or it might lead directly to one of those visions.

But another part of me longed for the experience.  The part that doesn’t miss a prison exposé on cable.  The part that wants to hear that iron gate close behind me.  To feel the starkness of the yard.  To see if the walls really do close in.   To be in the world of some guy who chopped his best friend into 107 pieces and then buried him in 107 different places.

I wanted to experience that world—live it—for just for a little while.  And I love baseball.  What better way to accomplish it than combine the two?

My M.O. isn’t hard to predict.  I knew the anxiety would peak the night before the game.  It’d be hard to sleep.  Probably wouldn’t have any appetite in the morning. 

Then I got a lucky break. 

Justin, from my amateur team back home, had signed up to play as well. 

A few years transplanted from Australia, Justin’s a natural athlete.  He picked up baseball as easy as my dog picked up begging at the table.  It’s impossible to get a low-pitch by him.  Must be from all those years of cricket.

Far more important for this adventure, he’s about as easygoing a guy as you can find.  It’s tough to get him upset.  I’ve tried.  Everyone on my team has tried.

We chatted in the hotel about what the next day might bring and it turned out he’d visited a maximum-security prison in Australia for a college thesis.  The whole thing was no big deal.  I half-expected him to fall asleep in the hotel patio as he described it.

Perfect.  I was with a vet.  My nerves could relax.

That’s when he mentioned that they’d probably make us sign a “no negotiations” waiver in case we were taken hostage.

Hostage?  It turned out there was one scenario I’d neglected to worry about.  Still, I managed to remain calm.

Then I met Kent.

Kent wasn’t one of the prisoners—he was their coach.  That’s on the inside.  On the outside, Kent’s a pastor.  We met him in a weary parking lot outside the gates at 8:30 in the morning where he gave us a quick talk about what to expect.  Kent’s another easygoing guy—especially for someone about to walk us into a maximum-security prison. 

It’s what he said that got the nerves working again.

San Quentin’s the only prison in the United States that has a baseball team for its inmates.  In fact, the program is so popular it’s now home to two teams, the Giants and the Pirates.  Usually comprised of players from adult amateur leagues, outside teams (known as “The Willing”) routinely play a doubleheader at “the Q”—one game against the Giants and one against the Pirates.

Today we’d take on the San Quentin Giants in both games. 

The Pirates weren’t too happy about this. 

Kent said he wasn’t sure what to expect.  There’d been a lot of unrest at the prison lately.  Overcrowding at Corcoran and Pelican Bay had forced the state to send much of the hard-core overflow here.  New, young guys had arrived.  Lifers who had nothing to lose. 

Things weren’t the same.

Maybe Kent noticed the widened eyes because he told us not to worry.  Nothing would ever happen to a visitor—every prison program in the state would end in a flash. 

Kent finished with an admonition:  if any of the players from the other team approached us during the game wanting personal information, don’t give it to them. 

Approached us?  From the unhappy team?  I thought these were the guys that had nothing to lose.

My carefully administered self-hypnosis—two months in the making—of why I would survive this impending experience shattered.  I’d already convinced myself we’d be hermitically sealed with at least three fences and a wall of armed guards partitioning us from anyone that wasn’t in the game.

I looked at the veterans of our team—none of whom I’d ever met—to reassure myself, to see the calm look on their faces.  Once I saw that “look”—the one people have when they’ve heard the whole speech before and are bored stiff—I’d be fine.

Instead apprehensive stares filled the audience.  My eyes darted to Justin, my last hope.  Even he looked slightly concerned.  With Justin, that’s the equivalent of a panic attack.

The information processing in my head began to blur.  New, hard-core guys.  Nothing to lose.  Trouble.  Waivers if I’m taken hostage. 

Maybe my friends are right.  Maybe I am a masochist.  It’s a death wish or something.  Psychologists would have a field day with me. 

One of the new guys broke in, “Just how good a shot are the guards in the tower?”  At least someone else was thinking along the same lines as me.

We showed our I.D.s at an outer gate and made the long walk to the prison walls.  To our right sat a row of quaint administration buildings.  To our left, the rippling currents of the bay reached out forever as if no prison existed.  But I took little notice on the gorgeous Saturday morning.  Instead a question revolved in my head that my brain couldn’t solve… “If the new guys in here have nothing to lose, why would they care if the programs shut down because they did something to a visitor?”

If you’ve watched any prison documentaries on TV, you know what I expected.  I expected the gate to clank behind us and then to be surrounded by my new world, a bleak world of rusted metal and chipped paint, curses shouted at me by every person in view.  Undecipherable screams would evaporate into the bay breeze from wherever they kept the people that had gone nuts… or had completely given up hope. 

That’s what I expected for a prison built in 1852. 

My first view gave me exactly the opposite.

A neatly tended courtyard greeted us when we exited the Sallyport (the controlled area between two metal gates), complete with lawn and roses.  On the far end, a massive state-of-the-art medical facility dominated the other buildings in the area.

Heading toward the 5-story building, I felt faces peering from barred windows in the archaic building to our left.  That building, the kind I’d expected to see, turned out to be the Adjustment Center, a housing unit for the most dangerous inmates on Death Row.

After crossing the courtyard, a long asphalt driveway led us between the new complex now to our left and the ancient wall that separated us from the free world on the right.

The San Quentin yard opened up.

The field wasn’t hard to spot—it was the only grass area in an expanse of asphalt, walls and fences.  Like a grammar school playground at lunchtime, a flurry of activity surrounded the diamond and filled the yard.  Men jockeyed for position as a shot went up on the basketball court.  Tennis balls volleyed.  And countless guys in dark blue sweats or shorts with light blue shirts just hung around. 

But as opposed to my elementary school, a chain link fence didn’t surround this yard.  Razor wire saturated these surroundings, everywhere, blocking anything anyone could ever think of climbing, crawling or hopping over. 

A four-foot space between two chain link fences would serve as our dugout.  Inside the partition, it took me a few minutes to realize that the long metal thing that looked like a narrow table was actually our bench.

The home team took the field.  I’d expected them to be in prison garb, but they had full uniforms (courtesy of the major league team), with an orange “Giants” emblazoned across black jerseys.  Their roster would be a few short today; anybody residing in H-block was absent.  A few prisoners in that unit had contracted a virus.  As a result, the whole block locked-down, a precaution due to the speed an epidemic can spread in a closed-off prison.

Beyond the clover outfield, the warning track contoured around the ins and outs of the fences that bordered our field.  The difference between this field and any other where I’ve played quickly struck me.  The spectators were inside the fences.  Prisoners lined the edges of the field, some in cliques, some loners, while many others walked or jogged the “warning track” that looped the yard. 

A new concern surfaced, hidden in the back of my mind by the question as to whether I’d survive the visit.  Was I even good enough to play in this game?  I’m 50 and live for baseball.  Sundays are dedicated to amateur ball in the 35 and older division of the Los Angeles Baseball League.  In that league, most have played long enough to have success because of our fundamentals.  But the arms are starting to go (if they’re not gone already).  The bat slows down.  The reflexes.  Though I do well, I no longer face 20-year old hurlers—the pitchers that can bring it.

Right away I saw their starter brought a hot fastball.  Just what I didn’t need.

We’d bat “through,” a common practice in adult amateur baseball where everyone on a 12 to 14 man roster bats instead of a traditional nine-man line-up.  It gives everyone a shot to participate.  Free defensive substitution is also allowed as opposed to more formal baseball rules.

We pushed across an unearned run in the first, but the Giants countered with a pair in the bottom of the inning.  Defense was sloppy; maybe I wasn’t the only one who was feeling the nerves.

The pebbles that saturated the all-dirt infield didn’t build confidence fielding the ground balls hit to me at second.  Still, the prisoners had obviously worked hard to make the field the best possible.  Not easy to do because, as Kent said, tools equal potential weapons. 

By the time I first came to the plate in the second I was sure of one thing.  Stay off the high fastball.  Their pitcher had too much heat for me—I’d never get around on it.

Our games on Sunday don’t have big crowds.  A few of the guys’ wives show up with the kids.  Maybe someone’s girlfriend.  That’s about it.  I played at a small college, and the attendance there wasn’t any bigger.

In the yard, I was in front of the biggest crowd of my life.  The quintessential captive audience.  But no catcalls or trash talk filled the air as I expected.  It didn’t matter.  I still felt the pressure.  As any athlete will admit, you want to go in and show the guys—on both squads—that you can play, that you’re not some slug that tagged along and drags the team down.  That you’re not that kid we all remember in the Pee-wee leagues—the last one picked—the one that swung after the ball was in the catcher’s glove.  I didn’t want to be that kid. 

Not here.

I take a high fastball that catches the corner.  The home plate ump, Junkyard (who has by far the coolest name of any umpire I’ve ever taken the field with) calls strike one.  Another fastball—up.  I swing.  Late.  Down oh and two.

Stay off that pitch.  Poke something somewhere.  Whatever you do, don’t “K” to start this day off.  

Not here.

Fastball, low and away.  I take it.

Junkyard rings me up.  Three pitches.  This day couldn’t have started worse.  Back to the metal table-looking thing.

A 3D puzzle of dilapidated structures sits beyond left-center.  Archaic stairs lead up and down the sides of faded yellow walls then turn to mysterious passageways before disappearing into areas unknown.  But my eyes fix past the maze of buildings to the notorious housing unit, West Block that looms above them.  A plume of steam pours out from one of the puzzle pieces to obscure the view.  It’s like a Dickens novel that’s come to life.

The prisoners responsible for hanging the numbers on the “Field of Dreams” scoreboard in right don’t dally after each half inning.  And they don’t give the benefit of the doubt on errors—even for the home club—as the miscues total almost as much as the score.

After six, we’re deadlocked at five.  But Kent has a wedding to perform between games, so it’ll be a shortened contest.  No inning will start later than 12:30. 

It’s 12:20 now.  The seventh is it.

That doesn’t bode well for us.  The SQ starter threw well, but the Giants now have Stretch on the mound to close it out.  The tall and lanky righty is likely San Quentin’s most famous player because he’s so good.

Stretch doesn’t throw as hard as their starter, but he quickly shows why he’s earned the reputation as a stellar pitcher.  It’s not his wide array of pitches; it’s his great command of them.  You’re not going to get anything good.

A hit, a stolen base and an out manages to move our go ahead runner to third. 

It’s our last chance.  And guess who’s coming up for us… 

I’m oh for two at this point.  In baseball, ohfers are long forgotten if you knock in the winning run.  All game I’ve been eyeing the short porch in right like the lifer who’s spotted a hole in the wall.  There’s some sort of caged-off material yard that shortens the field there.  Any batted-ball that makes the top of the cage is a homer.  It can’t be more than a 280-foot poke.  Probably shorter.  In my Sunday league, I’ll pop one out about once every two seasons with a metal bat.  But this I can reach, even with the wood we’re using.

Stretch makes his only mistake all day—he leaves one out over the plate.  Slightly outside.  I couldn’t ask for a better pitch to go the other way. 

Excitement raced through my veins as I ran to first.  I didn’t think I’d hit it well enough to make the top of the cage, but it certainly would be off the fence.  I’d return home to tell everyone about my game winning shot at San Quentin.

That’s when I learned a new aspect of playing in the yard.  Baseballs don’t carry as well above the wall as they do below it. 

My liner had taken off like a rocket, but once it got above the level of the wall, it died in the bay breeze like it’d been shot by a guard while trying to escape.  Not only didn’t it make the fence, it didn’t even make the track with the walking prisoners.  I watched it die, futilely dropping to the right fielder who was playing shallow by necessity of the short field.  My “blast” succumbed so quickly I wasn’t even sure it’d score the guy on third.

But in his eagerness to nail our guy at home, the right fielder misplayed the ball.  The go-ahead scored.  As far as I was concerned—as far as the legend would go—I’d crushed the game-winning RBI sac fly off San Quentin’s star pitcher.  No official scorekeeper would contradict me later.

The Giants launched a furious rally in the bottom of the inning, but couldn’t score.  We’d taken Game One.  From ohfer to hero at San Quentin.

Wait…

The Giants wanted to continue.  They weren’t going to lose this game.  Not by one run.  Coach Kent could go marry the couple.  They’d go on without him.

Despite the fact that my game-hero status was likely doomed, I had a begrudging admiration for the Giants’ insistence to go on.  It was like when you were a kid and stalled when it was time to go in for dinner because you wanted to keep playing outside.

We couldn’t touch Stretch after that.  But we still thought we had it until we gave up one (almost two) in the bottom of the ninth.  A tie.  And my game-winning “shot” turned into kiss your sister.

We did the congratulation line, with hugs.  I wasn’t worried about shivs anymore.  Stretch led both teams in prayer.  They thanked us for coming to play.  I couldn’t remember receiving more genuine gratitude.

Despite the whispered rumors in the dugout during the game, “three quarters of them are in for murder,” I never bothered to find out what each guy was in for.  I didn’t really care.  On this day, they weren’t any different from us.  They were just guys out playing ball.

Our team packed up our gear and started back toward the driveway.  Lunch would be outside the prison.  I lagged a bit at the bench to undo my knee-brace.  The anxiety was long gone.

That’s when the prison alarm went off. 

Instantly every inmate dropped to a squat.   Except for the loud drone of the buzzer, there wasn’t a movement or sound in the yard.

I’d almost forgotten where I was.

I didn’t know what to do.  The team huddled 100 feet away.  I heard a voice from somewhere say not to worry about it.  I think it was directed to us, but I didn’t know what that meant.  Should I make a move to get back with my group?  If I bolted for them I’d be the only moving person in the yard.  Now wasn’t the time to find out how good a shot the guards in the towers really were.

After a few minutes, the buzzer stopped and I hustled to the group.  I would hear it three more times in the second game. 

We’d win that one going away—our pitcher brought his good stuff on a late Saturday afternoon.  It was already well past seven when we said our goodbyes in the parking lot.  I drove off, wondering what I’d ever been so anxious about.

As I hopped on the freeway, a small insignificant sign I’d seen posted on the fence behind first base reappeared in my head. “FEEDING PIGEONS WILL RESULT IN CDC #115 BEING ISSUED.”

I didn’t have a clue what a CDC #115 meant other than the prisoners obviously would want to avoid getting it.  In our outside world, that sign would have no meaning.  Instead it would read something like, “$100 fine for feeding pigeons.” 

Theirs was a world where they knew what that CDC code meant.  And what every other CDC code meant, complete with its potential consequences. 

A world where they knew what to do when the buzzer went off in the yard. 

I’d come to try to live their world for a few brief hours and then be able to run back home where I’d be safe.  But there really was only so much I could experience as a visitor.  I could feel the flavor, but not know what it was to live the life. 

Instead I was rewarded with an experience that I’d taken for granted the entire adventure.  I’d joined a bunch of guys, from both sides of the wall, and for a day shared the same game we both loved.

And I drove off, looking forward to playing them again next year.

Where did baptism originate?

History. The practice of baptism emerged from Jewish ritualistic practices during the Second Temple Period, out of which figures such as John the Baptist emerged. For example, various texts in the Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS) corpus at Qumran describe ritual practices involving washing, bathing, sprinkling, and immersing.

John the Baptist ( c. 1st century BC – c. AD 30) was a Jewish preacher active in the area of the Jordan River in the early 1st century AD.

Who created the baptist religion?

Both Roger Williams and John Clarke are variously credited as founding the earliest Baptist church in North America. In 1639 Williams established a Baptist church in Providence, Rhode Island, and Clarke began a Baptist church in Newport, Rhode Island.

Who started the Baptist church and why?

The Particular Baptists stemmed from a non-Separatist church that was established in 1616 by Henry Jacob at Southwark, across the Thames from London. In 1638 a number of its members withdrew under the leadership of John Spilsbury to form the first Particular Baptist Church.

Why is Baptist called Baptist?

The term “baptists” came from the fact that Baptists strongly believed that: Baptism is for believers only. (excluding infant baptism) Baptism must be by immersion, as opposed to sprinkling and effusion.

What do Baptists not do?

Baptists do not believe that a loving God condemns anyone for a sin they did not commit. Baptists do not view baptism as a remedy for original sin. Baptists do not baptize infants. Baptists practice baptism by totally immersing persons in water, rather than by sprinkling, pouring, or anointing persons with water.

What is the difference between Baptist and southern Baptist?

The word Southern in “Southern Baptist Convention” stems from its having been organized in 1845 in Augusta, Georgia, by white Baptists in the Southern United States who supported continuing the institution of slavery and split from the northern Baptists (known today as the American Baptist Churches USA), who did not …

Why are Baptists not protestants?

Protestants date from the sixteenth century. They are the Lutherans, the Reformed (i.e. Anglicans, Presbyterians, etc.) and others who were once Roman Catholics and left the Roman Catholic faith to start denominations of their own. The Baptists never left the Roman Catholic Church as did Luther, Calvin and Zwingli.

The Baptist Tradition

The first Baptist churches were formed by English-speakers in Holland (1609-1612). They believed, as did Martin Luther, that believers were capable of reading and interpreting the Bible on their own. The Baptists separated from the Church of England because they believed church membership should be voluntary and that only believers should be baptized. They rejected the parish structure of the Church of England where people were “born” into the church and baptized as infants. John Smyth led the first congregation; Thomas Helwys traveled back to England the founded the first Baptist church there in 1612. The first Baptist church in North America was established by Roger Williams in what today is Providence, Rhode Island; soon thereafter, John Clarke founded a Baptist church in Newport, R.I.

(Source: http://www.abc-usa.org/what_we_believe/our-history/)

Arrival of Baptists in the Ozarks

Baptists came to Southeast Missouri in the early 1800’s, establishing the Bethel Baptist Church (Cape Girardeau County) in 1806. Organized in 1838, the Mount Pleasant Baptist Church is the oldest Baptist congregation in Greene County. According to an 1883 History of Green County, Missouri, “For many years it was the only church in the neighborhood, and was attended by people from many miles around.” Founded in 1852, Springfield’s First Baptist Church gathered in homes and in Temperance Hall before completing a church building in 1882.

Rhode Island State Charter of 1663

Roger Williams and John Clarke together secured a charter from King Charles II in 1663 guaranteeing religious freedom in Rhode Island. The state government of Rhode Island became the first government in history to guarantee separation of church and state, and religious freedom.

Many American Baptists look to Roger Williams (c. 1603-1683) as the founder of the Baptist movement in the United States. A proponent of separation of church and state, he founded the colony of Providence Plantation in 1636.

What makes Baptists different from other Christians?

The primary difference between Baptists and other Christians is the practice of believers’ baptism. Only people who have professed their faith can be baptized, in contrast to infant baptism practiced by most other Christian faiths, and baptism must occur by full-body immersion in water.

What are the three main beliefs of the Baptists?

The unity and coherence of the Baptists is based on six distinguishing, although not necessarily distinctive, convictions they hold in common.

  • The supreme authority of the Bible in all matters of faith and practice. …
  • Believer’s baptism. …
  • Churches composed of believers only.

History

Initially Baptists were characterized theologically by strong to moderate Calvinism. The dominant continuing tradition in both England and the United States was Particular Baptist. By 1800 this older tradition was beginning to be replaced by evangelical doctrines fashioned by the leaders of the evangelical revival in England and the Great Awakening in the United States. By 1900 the older Calvinism had almost completely disappeared, and evangelicalism was dominant. The conciliatory tendency of evangelicalism and its almost complete preoccupation with “heart religion” and the experience of conversion largely denuded it of any solid theological structure, thereby opening the door to a new theological current that subsequently became known as modernism. Modernism, which was an attempt to adjust the Christian faith to the new intellectual climate, made large inroads among the Baptists of England and the United States during the early years of the 20th century, and Baptists provided many outstanding leaders of the movement, including Shailer Mathews and Harry Emerson Fosdick. Many people regarded these views as a threat to the uniqueness of the Christian revelation, and the counterreaction that was precipitated became known as fundamentalism (a movement emphasizing biblical literalism).

As a result of the controversy that followed, many Baptists developed a distaste for theology and became content to find their unity as Baptists in promoting denominational enterprises. By 1950, outside the South, both modernists and fundamentalists were becoming disenchanted with their positions in the controversy, and it was from among adherents of both camps that a more creative theological encounter began to take place. While the majority of Baptists remained nontheological in their interests and concerns, there were many signs that Baptist leadership was increasingly recognizing the necessity for renewed theological inquiry.

Contents

The unity and coherence of the Baptists is based on six distinguishing, although not necessarily distinctive, convictions they hold in common.

1. The supreme authority of the Bible in all matters of faith and practice. Baptists are a non-creedal people, and their ultimate appeal always has been to the Scriptures rather than to any confession of faith that they may have published from time to time to make known their commonly accepted views.

2. Believer’s baptism. This is the most conspicuous conviction of Baptists. They hold that if baptism is the badge or mark of a Christian, and if a Christian is a believer in whom faith has been awakened, then baptism rightly administered must be a baptism of believers only. Furthermore, if the Christian life is a sharing in the life, death, and resurrection of Christ, if it involves a dying to the old life and a rising in newness of life, then the act of baptism must reflect these terms. The sign must be consonant with that which it signifies. It is for this latter reason that Baptists were led to insist upon immersion as the apostolic form of the rite.

3. Churches composed of believers only. Baptists reject the idea of a territorial or parish church and insist that a church is composed only of those who have been gathered by Christ and who have placed their trust in him. Thus the membership of a church is restricted to those who—in terms of a charitable judgment—give clear evidence of their Christian faith and experience.

4. Equality of all Christians in the life of the church. By the doctrine of the priesthood of all believers Baptists not only understand that the individual Christian may serve as a minister to other members but also that each church member has equal rights and privileges in determining the affairs of the church. Pastors have special responsibilities, derived from the consent of the church, which only they can discharge, but they have no unique priestly status.

5. Independence of the local church. By this principle Baptists affirm that a properly constituted congregation is fully equipped to minister Christ and need not derive its authority from any source, other than Christ, outside its own life. Baptists, however, have not generally understood that a local church is autonomous in the sense that it is isolated and detached from other churches. As individual Christians are bound to pray for one another and to maintain communion with one another, so particular churches are under similar obligation. Thus, the individual churches testify to their unity in Christ by forming associations and conventions.

SPONSORED CONTENT

See why people from around the world are making Minnesota their home.

By Explore Minnesota Tourism

6. Separation of church and state. From the time of Smyth, Baptists have insisted that a church must be free to be Christ’s church, determining its own life and charting its own course in obedience to Christ without outside interference. Thus Smyth asserted that the

Magistrate is not by virtue of his office to meddle with religion or matters of conscience, to force and compel men to this or that form of religion or doctrine, but to leave Christian religion free to every man’s conscience.

Baptists were in the forefront of the struggle for religious freedom in both England and the United States. They cherished the liberty established in early Rhode Island, and they played an important role in securing the adoption of the “no religious test” clause in the U.S. Constitution and the guarantees embodied in the First Amendment.

Few Baptists have been willing to become so sectarian as to deny the Christian name to other denominations. With the exception of the Southern Baptists, most Baptists cooperate fully in interdenominational and ecumenical bodies, including the World Council of Churches.

Worship and organization

Baptist worship is hardly distinguishable from the worship of the older Puritan denominations (Presbyterians and Congregationalists) of England and the United States. It centres largely on the exposition of the Scriptures in a sermon and emphasizes extemporaneous, rather than set, prayers. Hymn singing also is one of the characteristic features of worship. Communion, received in the pews, is customarily a monthly observance.

Baptists insist that the fundamental authority, under Christ, is vested in the local congregation of believers, which admits and excludes members, calls and ordains pastors, and orders its common life in accord with what it understands to be the mind of Christ. These congregations are linked together in cooperative bodies—regional associations, state conventions, and national conventions—to which they send their delegates or messengers. The larger bodies, it is insisted, have no control or authority over a local church; they exist only to implement the common concerns of the local churches.

The pattern of organization of the local church has undergone change since the 20th century. Traditionally, the pastor was the leader and moderator of the congregation, but there has been a tendency to regard the pastor as an employed agent of the congregation and to elect a lay member to serve as moderator at corporate meetings of the church. Traditionally, the deacons’ functions were to assist the pastor and to serve as agents to execute the will of the congregation in matters both temporal and spiritual; there has been a tendency, however, to multiply the number of church officers by the creation of boards of trustees, boards of education, boards of missions, and boards of evangelism. Traditionally, decisions were made by the congregation in a church meeting, but there has been a tendency to delegate decision making to various boards. The relationship of local churches to the cooperative bodies has undergone similar change, which has occasioned ongoing discussion among all Baptist groups.

Epilogue

Yesterday Captain XX emailed me asking for the baseball equipment back. In the same email I was informed that he and Lt. XXX were taking charge of the program. He also wanted the schedule and the contact info. I emailed back I would bring the equipment to the East Gate in a few days and that another coach had the schedule and the contact info and provided a way to contact that coach.

            The Captain–the once and present public affairs officer, for the prison–championed the A’s in 2010 and 2011. In a way he was turned by two ball players. These two clever cons convinced him that the A’s, the underdogs, deserved more, they deserved first class status. Indeed they sold Sam that the A’s were a better team and needed to replace the Giants. The Captain, an A’s fan, did what he could to make the A’s on a par, at least, with the Giants. A number of times I would hear, “Well, the Captain is on our side.”

            My wife Katie formulated a theory last year, 2011, that the prison would like to take the baseball program away from me. Now that the cameras and media folks were showing more and more interest, they wanted the glory–or so Katie said. I never agreed but thought that might, just might be possible. But the Captain always came across as such a gentleman.

            Perhaps this conspiracy type theory explains why I was treated as I was. Accused without an opportunity to hear the accusations much less defend myself; verbally abused by ZZZ without a single chance to say a word in reply. Then on not so much as a whim I get barred for life.

            DeNevi, my supervisor for twelve years, without whose support and encouragement I would have left SQ years ago–even he suddenly throws me under the bus, and not one phone call and Don usually called several times a week, and has from the beginning. Am I developing a paranoid frame of mind? Maybe. 

Baptists go back to John the Baptist and Before

Here not a means of conversion or salvation, but was a confessing of sin and preparation for the coming of the Messiah.

Prior to the days of Jesus, Jewish people baptized themselves while confessing their sin, and seeking cleansing from their sins.

Jesus said to be baptized––Matthew 28:19:

“Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.”

Continued in the early church

Acts 2:36-41 Acts 2:37–41

[37] Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” [38] And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. [39] For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” [40] And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” [41] So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.

Acts 8:9-13            Simon the Magician Believes

[9] But there was a man named Simon, who had previously practiced magic in the city and amazed the people of Samaria, saying that he himself was somebody great. [10] They all paid attention to him, from the least to the greatest, saying, “This man is the power of God that is called Great.” [11] And they paid attention to him because for a long time he had amazed them with his magic. [12] But when they believed Philip as he preached good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women. [13] Even Simon himself believed, and after being baptized he continued with Philip. And seeing signs and great miracles performed, he was amazed.

Acts 9:10-19 Paul is converted then baptized

[10] Now there was a disciple at Damascus named Ananias. The Lord said to him in a vision, “Ananias.” And he said, “Here I am, Lord.” [11] And the Lord said to him, “Rise and go to the street called Straight, and at the house of Judas look for a man of Tarsus named Saul, for behold, he is praying, [12] and he has seen in a vision a man named Ananias come in and lay his hands on him so that he might regain his sight.” [13] But Ananias answered, “Lord, I have heard from many about this man, how much evil he has done to your saints at Jerusalem. [14] And here he has authority from the chief priests to bind all who call on your name.” [15] But the Lord said to him, “Go, for he is a chosen instrument of mine to carry my name before the Gentiles and kings and the children of Israel. [16] For I will show him how much he must suffer for the sake of my name.” [17] So Ananias departed and entered the house. And laying his hands on him he said, “Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus who appeared to you on the road by which you came has sent me so that you may regain your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit.” [18] And immediately something like scales fell from his eyes, and he regained his sight. Then he rose and was baptized; [19] and taking food, he was strengthened.

Baptism, not a saving event, but a sign of the new birth or conversion

Later things changed – magically

In the fifth and sixth centuries a doctrine arose that everyone, at conception, inherited the sin of Adam, and that baptism, sprinkling the new born on the 8th day, removed that original sin. Then, the sin that followed one in life, was “magically” removed by the priests of the church following confession of sin. And so it continues in the Roman Catholic Church. Forgiveness comes by means, and magically, of the ministrations of the Church.

Wikipedia

Baptists form a major branch of evangelical Protestantism distinguished by baptizing only professing Christian believers (believer’s baptism) and doing so by complete immersion. Baptist churches generally subscribe to the responsibility and accountability of every person before God), sola fide (salvation by just faith alone), sola scriptura (the scripture of the Bible alone, as the rule of faith and practice) and congregationalist church government. Baptists generally recognize two ordinances: baptism and communion.

Diverse from their beginning, those identifying as Baptists today may differ widely from one another in what they believe, how they worship, their attitudes toward other Christians, and their understanding of what is important in Christian discipleship. Baptist missionaries have spread various Baptist confessions to every continent. The largest group of Baptist churches is the Baptist World Alliance, and there are many different groupings of Baptist churches and Baptist congregations.

Historians trace the earliest Baptist church to 1609 in Amsterdam, with English Separatist John Smyth as its pastor. In accordance with his reading of the New Testament, he rejected baptism of infants and instituted baptism only of believing adults. Baptist practice spread to England, where the General Baptists considered Christ’s atonement to extend to all people, while the Particular Baptists believed that it extended only to the electThomas Helwys formulated a distinctively Baptist request that the church and the state be kept separate in matters of law, so that individuals might have freedom of religion. Helwys died in prison as a consequence of the religious conflict with English Dissenters under James I.

Baptist historian Bruce Gourley outlines four main views of Baptist origins:

  1. the modern scholarly consensus that the movement traces its origin to the 17th century via the English Separatists,
  2. the view that it was an outgrowth of the Anabaptist movement of believer’s baptism begun in 1525 on the European continent,
  3. the perpetuity view which assumes that the Baptist faith and practice has existed since the time of Christ, and
  4. the successionist view, or “Baptist successionism“, which argues that Baptist churches actually existed in an unbroken chain since the time of Christ.
  5. English separatist view[edit]
  • John Smyth led the first Baptist church in Amsterdam in 1609.
  • Modern Baptist churches trace their history to the English Separatist movement in the 17th century, after the rise of the Protestant Reformation.[5] This view of Baptist origins has the most historical support and is the most widely accepted.[6] Adherents to this position consider the influence of Anabaptists upon early Baptists to be minimal.[3] It was a time of considerable political and religious turmoil. Both individuals and churches were willing to give up their theological roots if they became convinced that a more biblical “truth” had been discovered.[7]
  • During the Reformation, the Church of England (Anglicans) separated from the Roman Catholic Church. There were some Christians who were not content with the achievements of the mainstream Protestant Reformation.[1][8] There also were Christians who were disappointed that the Church of England had not made corrections of what some considered to be errors and abuses. Of those most critical of the church’s direction, some chose to stay and try to make constructive changes from within the Anglican Church. They became known as “Puritans” and are described by Gourley as cousins of the English Separatists. Others decided they must leave the church because of their dissatisfaction and became known as the Separatists.[3]

 What exactly do Baptists believe?

Baptists believe that faith is a matter between God and the individual (religious freedom). To them it means the advocacy of absolute liberty of conscience. Insistence on immersion believer’s baptism as the only mode of baptism. Baptists do not believe that baptism is necessary for salvation.

How are Baptists different from Christians?

The primary difference between Baptists and other Christians is the practice of believers’ baptism. Only people who have professed their faith can be baptized, in contrast to infant baptism practiced by most other Christian faiths, and baptism must occur by full-body immersion in water.

What were the Baptists known for?

Baptist, member of a group of Protestant Christians who share the basic beliefs of most Protestants but who insist that only believers should be baptized and that it should be done by immersion rather than by the sprinkling or pouring of water.

Who do Baptists believe Jesus is?

Jesus is Lord

Baptists believe that Jesus Christ, being eternally God, only begotten Son and the visible expression of the invisible God, effectively procured salvation for all creation through his death, burial and resurrection. He is the one assigned by God the Father to rule with authority over all of creation.

Do Baptists believe in the Virgin Mary?

For Baptists, Mary is a person like any person, called to a unique role in God’s plan of salvation, given a choice, and making the right choice by God’s grace in spite of her human imperfections.

What do Baptists reject?

Baptists fundamentally rejected any policy that afforded the state the “divine” authority to compel or even guide people in matters of religion.

What is the difference between Baptist and Southern Baptist?

The word Southern in “Southern Baptist Convention” stems from its having been organized in 1845 in Augusta, Georgia, by white Baptists in the Southern United States who supported continuing the institution of slavery and split from the northern Baptists (known today as the American Baptist Churches USA), who did not …

What religion did Baptists come from?

The two major explanations today link modern-day Baptists to the continental Anabaptists of the Reformation era or the Puritan renewal movement within the Church of England.Feb 13, 2023

Who founded the Baptist Church?

Roger Williams

Many American Baptists looks to Roger Williams (c. 1603-1683) as the founder of the Baptist movement in the United States. A proponent of separation of church and state, he founded the colony of Providence Plantation in 1636.

What do Baptist do at church?

Baptist worship is hardly distinguishable from the worship of the older Puritan denominations (Presbyterians and Congregationalists) of England and the United States. It centres largely on the exposition of the Scriptures in a sermon and emphasizes extemporaneous, rather than set, prayers.

What is the difference between Catholics and Baptists?

Catholics believe in the authority of the Pope, the sacraments as channels of divine grace, and the intercession of saints. Baptists strongly emphasize believer’s baptism, where individuals are baptized only after a personal commitment to Jesus Christ.

Are Baptists considered Catholic?

Traditional Baptist historians write from the perspective that Baptists had existed since the time of Christ. Proponents of the Baptist successionist or perpetuity view consider the Baptist movement to have existed independently from Roman Catholicism and prior to the Protestant Reformation.

What is unique to Baptist?

The primary difference between Baptists and other Christians is the practice of believers’ baptism. Only people who have professed their faith can be baptized, in contrast to infant baptism practiced by most other Christian faiths, and baptism must occur by full-body immersion in water.

What are basic Baptist beliefs?

The Baptist Church emphasizes the importance of a personal relationship with God through Jesus Christ. They believe that individuals can connect with God through prayer, worship, and study of the Bible. This relationship is seen as a source of strength and guidance in daily life.

What are the 4 major Baptist denominations?

Though dozens and dozens of Baptist denominations exist, over 90% of Baptists belong to just five groups: the Southern Baptist Convention, the National Baptist Convention USA, the National Baptist Convention of America, American Baptist Churches USA, and the Baptist Bible Fellowship International.

What is the most popular Baptist denomination?

Southern Baptists are the largest evangelical Protestant group in the United States. Descended from Baptists who settled in the American colonies in the 17th century, Southern Baptists formed their own denomination in 1845, following a rift with their northern counterparts over slavery.

What religion is the same as Baptist?

Baptists are members of a Protestant Christian denomination, united by a specific set of religious beliefs. Baptists originated with a 16th-century denomination known as the Anabaptists, and have since grown into a religious denomination with millions of members worldwide.

What are the two types of Baptist?

Some doctrinal issues on which there is widespread difference among Baptists are: Eschatology. Arminianism versus Calvinism (General Baptists uphold Arminian theology while Particular Baptists teach Calvinist theology).

What percentage of America is Baptist?

15.3%

Approximately 15.3% of Americans identify as Baptist, making Baptists the second-largest religious group in the United States, after Roman Catholics.

Which religion is declining the fastest?

According to the same study Christianity is expected to lose a net of 66 million adherents (40 million converts versus 106 million apostate) mostly to religiously unaffiliated category between 2010 and 2050, it is also expected that Christianity may have the largest net losses in terms of religious conversion.

Why are churches removing Baptist from their name?

There is a growing trend among Baptists, and that is to abandon the historic doctrines that Baptists have stood for down through the ages. Some of them are manifesting that desire, by dropping the name Baptist from their Church name. Others continue to use the name Baptist, but have retreated from Baptist doctrine.

Appendix A

Here is an account of a game played at San Quentin between the Pirates, now Giants, and the Oaks/Cubs, the very same team led by Elliot Smith that opened the 2010 season. My old and dear friend Bill Mauck and his son Michael were present and played in the game. Here is Bill’s story of that game.

We Had a Great Time

by Bill Mauck

            Thursday, March 13, 1998, was a cold, cloudy day at San Quentin penitentiary.  As my nineteen-year-old son, Michael, and I approached the front gate, I could feel a light drizzle against my face.  We were greeted by a guard.  He checked our names off the manifest, wanded us down and checked our gear.  We walked about 200 yards to the main prison walls, where another guard repeated the same process.  We were then directed through a series of electronically controlled steel doors.  As the last door slammed behind us, we emerged into a vast courtyard.  The mood became dark, almost surreal.  To our right were some gray buildings.  One of the buildings had the words “Attitude Adjustment” Center etched on the wall.  Instinctively I knew we did not want to go there.  To my right were some men in bright orange jumpsuits.  I later learned these men were HIV positive. 

            At the far end of the courtyard was a baseball diamond.  As I walked out onto the infield, I could smell the fresh cut grass.  I felt my cleats dig into the soft turf.  It felt good!  It had been a while.  My high school friend, Kent Philpott, is a minister in Mill Valley, and he coaches the San Quentin Pirates baseball team.

            As it turns out, the Pirates were scheduled to play the San Francisco Oaks Semi-pro baseball team this day, and the Oaks were going to be short a couple of players.  Kent invited Mike and me to come down for a visit and play in this game.

            While Mike and I were warming up with the other players along the right field line, the Oaks coach observed us and made some quick decisions.  It was determined that Mike would lead off and play second base.  I would bat ninth and be dispatched to right field.  Right field is unique at San Quentin.  There is only about two feet of grass in foul territory along the right field foul line.  It then becomes a concrete slab.  Right field is short, only about 290 feet to the warning track.  Normally the warning track is dirt.  Outfielders can feel their cleats dig into the dirt when they come off the grass and this lets them know they are about ten feet from the fence.  At San Quentin the warning track is asphalt.  After the warning track the surface becomes concrete.  There is no fence; instead, there are benches and tables.  This is special, as it makes it possible for the inmates to sit, enjoy the game and make helpful suggestions to the opposing team’s right fielder.

            In right center field is the Indian Nation.  The Indians have some tepees, sweat-houses, drums and there are fires burning.  The nation is protected by a forty-foot-tall portable handmade screen made of woven cloth and called the White Monster.  The Native Americans’ religion says that you can sweat your sins away.

            So here I am, a fifty-eight-year-old man taking my position in right field.  Off my right shoulder, I can hear the tom-toms.  Thump thump, thump thump, thump thump.  My nostrils fill with smoke.  My eyes are burning.  Off my left shoulder, I can hear the constant chatter of the prisoners.  “Hey, Col. Sanders, Mon!  How ‘bout some chicken wings and cerveza for the homeboys in right field.”  “Hey, Mon!  Pops don’t have no beer, just look at him.  He drank it all up already.”  Haaaaaaa, I started thinking to myself.  Self you are a first baseman.  What the hell are you doing in right field?!  Then I thought maybe I’ll get lucky, and nothing will get hit out here.  Baseball has an old and true axiom.  It states that the ball will find you.  It didn’t take long.  In the first inning the Pirates hit three hard ground balls in my direction.  I was able to get in front of the ball and hit the cutoff man.  Everything was all good until this big left-handed hitter came up and hit a high fly ball to straightaway right field.  I raced back.  I felt my cleats dig into the asphalt and then clank on the concrete.  I looked down.  The inmates scattered.  I weaved my way through the benches, but when I looked back up, I had lost the flight of the ball.  The ball landed on a table and caromed off a bench.  Buy the time I retrieved the ball the runner had rounded third base and was on his way home.  Things did not get better.  Next, they started hitting balls over on to the concrete in foul territory.  Cleats have a tendency to slip and slide on concrete.  I didn’t catch any of them.  I walked and struck out.  I began to think that I had swerved into the twilight zone of baseball.

            My son, Mike, did much better.  He struck the ball hard and made some good plays in the field.  When Mike steps into the batter’s box he assumes an open stance, with his feet set about three feet apart.  As he stands in, he likes to move his hips from side to side.  This drew some interesting comments from some of the more progressive inmates.  The San Quentin Pirates had a good team; they beat the Oaks eight to two.  After the game the mood was jovial, we shook hands and exchanged pleasantries.  Had this game been played anywhere else, I would not have guessed that these men were convicts.

            We returned to my friend’s home.  We sat in Kent’s arbor and enjoyed a cold bottle of beer.  I began to lament about some of my play.  Kent philosophized that baseball would keep me humble.  Mike spoke up and said, “Chill, Dad!  You gave it your best shot.  I had a great time.”   I looked at my son and realized that this was one of those defining moments.  We had played this game not as father and son, but as just two players.  It was a day that each of us would remember.  I looked at him and replied, “You are right, Mike.  I had a great time too.” 

Here is something unusual, a listing of all the Baptists in the world today. Little long I know. Kent

Baptist Denominations in America

Alliance of Baptists

American Baptist Association

American Baptist Churches USA

Baptist Bible Fellowship International

Baptist General Convention of Texas

Baptist Missionary Association of America

Canadian Baptists of Atlantic Canada

Converge

Cooperative Baptist Fellowship

Foundations Baptist Fellowship International

General Association of Regular Baptist Churches (GARBC)

National Association of Free Will Baptists

National Baptist Convention/USA Inc.

National Baptist Convention of America Inc., International

National Missionary Baptist Convention of America

North American Baptist Conference

Pentecostal Free Will Baptists

Primitive Baptists

Seventh Day Baptists

Southern Baptist Convention

Venture Church Network

Baptist General Association of Virginia

How many Baptist denominations are there in the world?

While just five Baptist denominations are home to over 90% of Baptists, there are over 65 different denominations. The autonomy of local churches and the fact that there are so many Baptists mean there may be even more specific denominations.

This list of Baptist denominations is a list of subdivisions of Baptists, with their various Baptist associations, conferences, conventions, fellowships, groups, and unions around the world. Unless otherwise noted, information comes from the World Baptist Alliance[1]

Africa[edit]

Central Africa[edit]

Southern Africa[edit]

West Africa[edit]

East Africa[edit]

Asia and Oceania[edit]

Regional bodies[edit]

East Asia[edit]

Bangladesh[edit]

India[edit]

Main article: List of Baptist denominations in India

Southeast Asia[edit]

Philippines[edit]

Oceania[edit]

The Caribbean[edit]

Barbados[edit]

Cuba[edit]

Haiti[edit]

Jamaica[edit]

Other[edit]

St. Vincent and the Grenadines[edit]

Europe and Eurasia[edit]

Regional bodies[edit]

Eurasia

Continental Europe[edit]

Eurasia[edit]

United Kingdom[edit]

Middle East[edit]

North America[edit]

Canada[edit]

Mexico[edit]

United States[edit]

National bodies[edit]

State and interstate bodies[edit]

Central and South America[edit]

Central America[edit]

South America[edit]

Brazil[edit]

Other[edit]

Global[edit]

A Final Word

Coming out soon will be Kent’s book titled:

Outside-Inside-Outside: Escaping from Prison.

It will be available at Amazon.com.

In it will pieces written by convicts still in prison, some by those who are now on the outside, plus a piece from a correctional officer at San Quentin Prison, and much more.

Also, hope you don’t mind this sort of salesmanship, but the 2011-2012 Baseball Season at San Quentin is ready for publication, Katie having sent me the finished work this very morning. How long until it can be bought, not sure, but I will let you know.

Okay, not the last, I discovered several more pieces. Yes, not the brightest bulb on the tree.

Kent

#9

Last, the story of my conversion.

      My wife Bobbie started going to church when she was fifteen years old. We married when she was eighteen, and since I was unable to survive financially, I joined the military, the Air Force. After boot camp and training as a medic at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, I was stationed at Travis Air Force Base near Fairfield, California. We got a little apartment in Suisun City and after a while, Bobbie started attending First Baptist Church of Fairfield, Bob Lewis from Arkansas, was the pastor.

      I was not a Christian though my dad took the three Philpott boys to church in Portland, Oregon. As soon as I could, I refused to attend, and the same for my two younger brothers. Now I was faced with pleasing my wife or not. To do so, I would occasionally, about once a month, attend Sunday services. One of those Sunday’s, at the typical Baptist invitation to receive Christ, I walked forward, likely to please my wife than anything else. Staff Sargent Al Becker came to me, and he had me pray the “Sinner’s Prayer.” In a moment I was converted! Or was I?

      Of course, I would have to be baptized. Usually this would be done within a week or two, but a new, and much larger building was being built, and Pastor Bob decided to wait until the new structure was build and then a baptism would take place there.

      About six months went by, and finally the building was complete and there would be a baptism. Too late for me to resist, so I went along with it. I knew I was not “saved,” but for my wife, I had to play the part.

      The day came and there I was in line with about 20 other guys, mostly Air Force guys. I would be one of the last to be dunked, and I can still picture myself waiting in line.

      I was close enough to see Pastor Bob putting the guys under the water. Only two ahead of me now. And at that moment, something happened. All of a sudden, I was converted, yes, born again, and I knew it. In a few minutes I was in the water, Pastor Bob said something, I said, “Yes” and down I went.

      Talk about a radical change! Indeed, it was for me. My life would never be the same.

Final Note:

The first eight stories here all took place during the Jesus People Movement, which were rather typical of a time when the Holy Spirit was poured out in power and there were lots of miracles, undeniable miracles. During what is often called, “Ordinary Times” such events are rare at best. My conversion came during these times, yet it was utterly amazing.