The Normal Christian Life

Based on these passages: Matthew 28:16–20; John 3:1–8; Acts 1:6–8; 2:41–42; 5:12–16; 16:25–30; 1 Corinthians 11:23–26;1 John 1:8–2:1.

Find a quiet place, alone and apart from distractions. Be comfortably alert, still and at peace. Say the Lord’s Prayer. Sing or cant the Jesus Prayer. Pray for family, friends, neighbors, and yourself. Slowly and carefully read the passages of Scripture.

1.         Though each Christian is different, we have a number of things in common. A number of books have been written with the above title: there is, in general, a normal Christian life.

2.         It all begins with conversion, known as the new birth. This is an act of God and not dependent upon anything we can do. At this point, the very Holy Spirit of God indwells us, all our sin is forgiven, past, present, even future sin. And at this very moment we are placed, in a way we cannot understand, into the Body of Christ, that Church known only to Him.

3.         The next common and biblical step is to be baptized in water, and to be baptized is to be immersed in water for that is the meaning of the word, baptize. This is not a saving event, but a testimony to others and especially to the one baptized.

4.         We are to observe what is called The Lord’s Supper, otherwise known as Communion, and the Eucharist and on an ongoing basis, which varies among Christians. This also is not a saving event but a memorial directed toward the cross of Christ.

5.         We are to be witnesses to the saving work of Jesus on the cross, live sacrificially, love one another, and do good to those we have opportunity.

6.         We are to live to the praise of His glory and patiently await the return of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Taking Away Hope

The pro-gay position among Christians effectively deprives the homosexual of hope. These persons may be attempting to reach out in love to the gay community as an act of faith. But to say that a gay person is born that way and therefore can not help but be homosexual takes away hope. And if the pro-gay faction in the churches then expand the genetic argument and insist that homosexual behavior is natural and normal (certain diseases can also be inborn or genetic in nature), both psychologically and sociologically, this further condemns a person to what many gay people will admit is an unhappy, even desperate, life. And it also condemns this person to a dreadful eternity as well.

A Frightening Passage

The passage I am about to quote is one that is feared, even hated, by pro-gay ‘Christians’. It is a passage that has been vigorously attacked by pro-gay Bible commentators because of its powerful message. But it is a passage that is simple and clear in its meaning, and yet, in my view, holds out a great deal of hope for the homosexual.  The first part of the passage is:

            Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 1 Cor. 6:9–10  

 My intent is not to ‘clobber’ anyone with the Bible. And I do not want to scare anyone either–I want to present the hope that all sinners have in the Christ.

An Examination of the Passage

‘Homosexual offenders’ is a translation of the Greek word arsenokoite, a word that Paul made up (Paul made up or coined about 170 words that we find in his New Testament letters). The word he used is a combination of arsenos meaning ‘male’, and koite meaning ‘bed’ or ‘couch’. Paul found these words in Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, in the Greek translation of the Old Testament called the Septuagint. The Levitical verses forbid and condemn homosexuality. Paul put the two words together because he wanted to describe men who had sex together. It is not homosexual prostitution or violent homosexual rape that the Law of Moses is concerned with as is so often presented by pro-gay writers. No, the language is clear and straightforward–homosexual offenders, or those who practice homosexuality, will not inherit the kingdom of God.   

   Homosexual behavior is not the only sinful behavior mentioned in the Corinthian passage. There is quite a long list and I find some of my own sins there, too.  There are the heterosexuals who are immoral and adulterers who have sex outside of marriage with someone other than their spouse. There are those who worship gods who are no gods at all. There are thieves, greedy people, drunkards, slanderers, and swindlers listed–I find myself here. I have broken God’s holy ordinance and therefore, barring a miracle, I will not inherit the kingdom of God. If God’s Word is true, I am in desperate trouble.

 Am I Without Hope?

Since I find my sin(s) plainly listed in the passage, am I then without hope? In one sense I have no hope for I can not do anything about changing what has already happened, and, to make matters worse, I can not be assured that I will not sin again sometime in the future. Though I do not want to sin and dishonour my Lord, but because sin dwells within me, I likely will sin again (John tells me I will in 1 John 1:8–2:1–2. Yet I am not without hope, in fact, I am most hopeful. I know for a fact that Jesus has died in my place on the cross; I know He has taken all my sin upon Himself, and that I can be forgiven, trusting in Jesus as the Holy Spirit enables me. Certainly I can do nothing, but this Jesus, risen from the dead, has already done what I can not do. Indeed, He gives me His righteousness, gives it to me though I do not deserve it at all. This is the good news, the gospel.

The Proof of Hope

Earlier I quoted 1 Corinthians 6:9–10. But I stopped short of the real point Paul was making to the believers in Corinth. We need now to look at verse 11 for in it is the proof of our hope.

And that is what some of your were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

   In that Corinthian church were people like me–guilty of many sins, addicted to some, helplessly in the control of others. Yet, something happened to them and Paul used three words to describe it–washed, sanctified, and justified.

   Washed is forgiveness, a work of the Holy Spirit. This is the application of the blood Jesus shed on the cross to the sinner. With the shedding of blood there is the forgiveness of sin even sin like my own, sin like homosexual behavior, too. I can not forgive my own sin neither can a church or a priest or a minister or anyone or anything else forgive sin, no, only Jesus’ blood can wash away sin. Did Jesus die on the cross and shed His blood to then withhold it from those who seek Him? Not at all, remember Jesus is the one who came to call, not the righteous, but sinners to repentance. And the washing, the cleansing, of the blood of Jesus actually brings us to a place or repentance. Washed, clean, forgiven, this is more wonderful than anything can ever be.

   Sanctified then is to be set aside as belonging to Jesus Himself. It is the result of the washing–forgiven and cleansed of sin we are indwelt by the Holy Spirit. The sanctified are embraced by the Father and adopted into His own Family. God’s Holy Spirit actually lives within us because that which prevented His doing so was overcome when our sins were forgiven. It is completely the work of God. He sets us aside, makes us holy, and begins to work within us both to will and to work for His good pleasure–which takes a whole lifetime.

    Justified might well have been mentioned first, or second, because it is the experience of conversion or the new birth. It happens as we are washed and sanctified. Where one begins and the other ends we do not know. There is a mystery to it all, though it is very real at the same time. Justified might be defined as the sinner being restored to a condition of purity, as though no sin had ever been committed. It is by faith, it is grace. It is all a gift. Faith is a gift, we really have none of it in ourselves rather it is given to us. This is what we mean by grace–forgiveness and eternal life freely given despite the fact that we are unworthy. This is illustrated for us in the words, new birth. We did not affect our own physical birth and so we can not affect our spiritual birth. It is all a gift of God, not based on any kind or manner of work.

Giving Back Hope

Those who have bought into the notion that they were born homosexual and that it is their very nature to be homosexual may find hope in the words of Paul and in the experience of some of the Christians in the church at Corinth. There were homosexuals there, and they had turned away from homosexual behavior though they might not have become heterosexuals (some today at any rate experience a change in their sexual orientation but others do not so it is not unreasonable to state that such might have been the case in Corinth).

A Special Appeal

To those who have loved ones who are gay, perhaps a son or daughter, I appeal to you that you not take away their hope by agreeing that they can not help but engage in homosexual activity.

   There is a powerful tendency to overlook what the Scripture teaches and adopt a pro-gay stance thinking we are standing with and supporting our gay loved ones. Many do this. It is, in the long run, better to love the person, be supportive in whatever means possible, all the while refusing to validate the sinful behavior. This ‘tough-love’ may well prove to be both hopeful and redemptive.

Words of Hope

The pro-gay movement unwittingly takes away hope but the promise of the Scripture gives it back. And these grand words of Paul provide for us a most fitting close to this essay:

May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace as you trust in him, so that you may overflow with hope by the power of the Holy Spirit. Romans 15:13

Kent Philpott

Mill Valley, California

February 2000

All or Nothing

Most mornings I have to wait in line at the 7-11 Store to buy my newspaper while people place their bets with the California Lottery. A woman, anticipating my impatience as she took an inordinate amount of time, turned to me and defended her purchase of 20 lottery tickets. “I have to have something to look forward to”, she said.

I knew what she meant. All day long she would daydream about the millions she might win. The very thought of it could carry her through the day.

We are all gamblers of one kind or another. In fact, many Californians are hoping to ease tax burdens through institutional games of chance. Someone even said that the state is becoming one vast casino.

The woman at the store was not putting all her money on the proverbial “line”; but many are risking far more than their money. The big gamble

There is an even bigger gamble than the lottery. People are gambling that the grave is the absolute end of life. My guess is that this is the most popular, albeit unnamed, gamble of them all.

The cessation of all life at biological death — this is the great hope of the godless. Nearly everyone who is committed to atheistic evolutionary schemes, is hoping for this. These people also reject any form of reincarnation, as taught by Hinduism or Buddhism, though I notice that they do not oppose eastern religious as vigorously as they reject the traditional Christian doctrine about an after-life.

The “life ends at death” theory is powerful because of the abundance of evidence that seems to support it. And I admit there are many claims flowing from the physical sciences that seem to deny the need for a creator God.

Theories and hypotheses are announced regularly. “Life has been discovered on Mars” (or not, as the case may be). Missing links are supposedly being dug up regularly (and then denied by rival anthropologists). Today’s materialistic headline is tomorrow’s small print casting doubt on the “discovery”.

Nevertheless, it is all grist to the atheists’ mill, and they airily promise that all objections to their theories will be met sooner or later. There is no question, the theory that “life ends at death” is attractive and powerful. Where is the proof?

No one committed to this doctrine, however, can be absolutely sure it is true. It is an article of faith and nothing more. It is a gamble, and the stakes are monstrously high — nothing less than eternity. Let us be clear; relying on the theory that “the grave is the end” is a gigantic gamble.

Let me take this as far as I can. Suppose that the theories put forth by agnostics and atheists to account for life are absolutely correct. Who is to say that beyond and behind these there is not a God who started it all?

Even if the universe and the earth are as old as the theories suggest, does this do away with God? Certainly not! Science, contend many (including intellectual giants like Isaac Newton and Michael Faraday), can only discover the handiwork of God anyway.

Besides, experience teaches that scientific “truth” has a habit of changing. God, on the other hand, does not change. It is unwise to wager everything on presumptions founded on scientific theory. Would a miracle do?

Jesus told the story of a rich man who died and went to hell. A beggar, who had lain at the rich man’s gate, also died and went to heaven. The rich man wanted God (Abraham in the story) to send the beggar to warn his family. He did not want them to join him in that terrible place of punishment and anguish.

But, Lazarus was not allowed to go. God said the rich man’s family had the Bible to warn them. If they did not believe the Scriptures, they still would not believe even if someone returned from the dead (Luke 16:19-31).

It is easy to sympathize with the rich man. He thought a miracle would be persuasive. And this might seem to be the case for the “life ends at death” devotee. How many people have sworn: “If I could just have a sign, if I could just know for sure, then I would believe”. And it does seem logical. If God would only grant a miracle, it would make it all a lot easier.

But God has done so! He has given assurance to all men, says the apostle Paul, by raising Jesus from the dead (Acts 17:31). God’s way is faith, faith that is placed in Jesus of Nazareth who died in our place on the cross and then rose from the dead. Those who reject the evidence of the resurrection of Christ are like the rich man’s relatives; they remain un-persuaded, even by a miracle. The end of the story

The woman at the store buying the lottery tickets was not making an all-or-nothing bet. But so many are doing so, wagering everything on their belief that the grave is the end. Like the rich man, they will be shocked when they lose their bet. But their discovery will come only after the wager has been collected by the “house”. Hell is a truth learned too late.

Kent Philpott

1999

* This essay appeared in Evangelical Times, published by Evangelical Press

For to Us a Child is Born

Isaiah 9:1–7

Find a quiet place, alone and apart from distractions. Be comfortably alert, still and at peace. Say the Lord’s Prayer. Sing or cant the Jesus Prayer. Pray for family, friends, neighbors, and yourself. Slowly and carefully read the passages of Scripture. Reread them. From memory, determine the central points.

1.         The passage begins with a word of hope. Despite the pressure from the alliance of Syria and Israel, and the even larger threat from Assyria, yet the word of the Lord looks ahead to something so very far better.

2.         Isaiah is a prophet and a poet, giving out the most beautiful sets of parallelisms such as:

“The people who walked in darkness have seen a great light;

those who dwelt in a land of deep darkness, on them has light shone.

3.         In verse 6 comes then the great promise of that which is to come, to that which had been declared in the 7th chapter:

“For to us a child is born, to us a son is given” this child of the virgin will be supreme above all.

4.         In typical Hebrew fashion Isaiah says “his name shall be called.” The name, more than a name, has to do with who this son is. The prophet now uses four unique phrases in an attempt to describe the nearly indescribable.

5.         “Wonderful Counselor”–the all knowning one who comforts and consoles, and we are reminded of John 14:25–26.

Then “Mighty God”–Here we see that the son is God, the mighty God, a pre-shadowing of the Trinity.

6.         Third then, “Everlasting Father,” and somewhat equivalent to the third title, “Mighty God,” and here the eternal nature of the God head is proclaimed. Also the word “Father” reveals a familial nature as to who this God is.

7.         “Prince of Peace” and the word for “peace” in Hebrew is Shalom. And here it is that we see the foreshadowing of the cross where the prince of peace is crucified, thus reconciling the rebellious sinner with the Creator God.

8.         And how will this come to pass? “The zeal of the LORD of hosts will do this” Isaiah declares.

Meditation: The Darkside

There’s a Dark Side to Meditation That No One Talks About

Meditation can bring about a wide variety of thoughts and emotions—some are peaceful, others are not.

Quartz

  • Lila MacLellan

The calm before the panic attack.

We’ve all heard about the benefits of meditation ad nauseam. Those disciplined enough to practice regularly are rewarded with increased control over the brainwaves known as alpha rhythms, which leads to better focus and may help ease pain. In addition to calming the mind and body, meditation can also reduce the markers of stress in people with anxiety disorders. Rigorous studies have backed health claims such as these to convince therapists, physicians, and corporate gurus to embrace meditation’s potential.

What contemporary and ancient meditators have always known, however, is that while the hype may be warranted, the practice is not all peace, love, and blissful glimpses of unreality. Sitting zazen, gazing at their third eye, a person can encounter extremely unpleasant emotions and physical or mental disturbances.

Zen Buddhism has a word for the warped perceptions that can arise during meditation: makyo, which combines the Japanese words for “devil” and “objective world.” Philip Kapleau, the late American Zen master, once described confronting makyo as “a dredging and cleansing process that releases stressful experiences in deep layers of the mind.”

However, this demanding and sometimes intensely distressing side of meditation is rarely mentioned in scientific literature, says Jared Lindahl, a visiting professor of religious studies at Brown University, who has an interest in neuroscience and Buddhism. Along with Willoughby Britton, a psychologist and assistant professor of psychiatry at Brown, the two meditators have co-authored a study that documents and creates a taxonomy for the variant phenomenology of meditation. The paper, published in Plos One, is the beginning of an ongoing series of studies. “Just because something is positive and beneficial doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be aware of the broader range of possible effects it might have,” Lindahl says.

To conduct their research, the pair interviewed 60 Western Buddhist meditation practitioners who had all experienced challenging issues during their practice. They included both rookies and meditation teachers, many of whom had accumulated more than 10,000 hours of meditation experience in their lifetime. All belonged to either Theravāda, Zen, or Tibetan traditions.

The researchers identified 59 kinds of unexpected or unwanted experiences, which they classified into seven domains: cognitive, perceptual, affective (related to moods), somatic, conative (related to motivation), sense of self, and social. Among the experiences described to them were feelings of anxiety and fear, involuntary twitching, insomnia, a sense of complete detachment from one’s emotions, hypersensitivity to light or sound, distortion in time and space, nausea, hallucinations, irritability, and the re-experiencing of past traumas. The associated levels of distress and impairment ranged from “mild and transient to severe and lasting,” according to the study. Most would not imagine that these side-effects could be hiding behind the lotus-print curtains of your local meditation center.

However, the survey respondents didn’t necessarily perceive every non-euphoric event as negative. In fact, says Britton, she and Lindahl deliberately avoided the word “adverse” in their study for this reason. Instead, they chose “challenging,” which better captured the meditators’ varied interpretations of their experiences. For instance, a person who came away from a retreat feeling “very expanded and very unified with other people in the world” might have found their oneness with the universe distracting once they returned home. (That’s challenging, not tragic.)

The goal of the study was to look for patterns in the common accounts of unwanted reactions. Who runs into the unexpected hurdles? What are the unique set of factors involved? In which ways do teachers assist students who are struggling? (And do they blame inner demons for the upsets, or maybe something you ate at lunch?) The answers, which still require future research, may one day be relevant to the ways meditation is used as therapy.

The calm before the panic attack.

We’ve all heard about the benefits of meditation ad nauseam. Those disciplined enough to practice regularly are rewarded with increased control over the brainwaves known as alpha rhythms, which leads to better focus and may help ease pain. In addition to calming the mind and body, meditation can also reduce the markers of stress in people with anxiety disorders. Rigorous studies have backed health claims such as these to convince therapists, physicians, and corporate gurus to embrace meditation’s potential.

What contemporary and ancient meditators have always known, however, is that while the hype may be warranted, the practice is not all peace, love, and blissful glimpses of unreality. Sitting zazen, gazing at their third eye, a person can encounter extremely unpleasant emotions and physical or mental disturbances.

Zen Buddhism has a word for the warped perceptions that can arise during meditation: makyo, which combines the Japanese words for “devil” and “objective world.” Philip Kapleau, the late American Zen master, once described confronting makyo as “a dredging and cleansing process that releases stressful experiences in deep layers of the mind.”

However, this demanding and sometimes intensely distressing side of meditation is rarely mentioned in scientific literature, says Jared Lindahl, a visiting professor of religious studies at Brown University, who has an interest in neuroscience and Buddhism. Along with Willoughby Britton, a psychologist and assistant professor of psychiatry at Brown, the two meditators have co-authored a study that documents and creates a taxonomy for the variant phenomenology of meditation. The paper, published in Plos One, is the beginning of an ongoing series of studies. “Just because something is positive and beneficial doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be aware of the broader range of possible effects it might have,” Lindahl says.

To conduct their research, the pair interviewed 60 Western Buddhist meditation practitioners who had all experienced challenging issues during their practice. They included both rookies and meditation teachers, many of whom had accumulated more than 10,000 hours of meditation experience in their lifetime. All belonged to either Theravāda, Zen, or Tibetan traditions.

The researchers identified 59 kinds of unexpected or unwanted experiences, which they classified into seven domains: cognitive, perceptual, affective (related to moods), somatic, conative (related to motivation), sense of self, and social. Among the experiences described to them were feelings of anxiety and fear, involuntary twitching, insomnia, a sense of complete detachment from one’s emotions, hypersensitivity to light or sound, distortion in time and space, nausea, hallucinations, irritability, and the re-experiencing of past traumas. The associated levels of distress and impairment ranged from “mild and transient to severe and lasting,” according to the study. Most would not imagine that these side-effects could be hiding behind the lotus-print curtains of your local meditation center.

However, the survey respondents didn’t necessarily perceive every non-euphoric event as negative. In fact, says Britton, she and Lindahl deliberately avoided the word “adverse” in their study for this reason. Instead, they chose “challenging,” which better captured the meditators’ varied interpretations of their experiences. For instance, a person who came away from a retreat feeling “very expanded and very unified with other people in the world” might have found their oneness with the universe distracting once they returned home. (That’s challenging, not tragic.)

The goal of the study was to look for patterns in the common accounts of unwanted reactions. Who runs into the unexpected hurdles? What are the unique set of factors involved? In which ways do teachers assist students who are struggling? (And do they blame inner demons for the upsets, or maybe something you ate at lunch?) The answers, which still require future research, may one day be relevant to the ways meditation is used as therapy. 

The Sign of Immanuel

     Isaiah 7:10–17

Find a quiet place, alone and apart from distractions. Be comfortably alert, still, and at peace. Say the Lord’s Prayer. Sing or cant the Jesus Prayer. Pray for family, friends, neighbors, and yourself. Slowly and carefully read the passage of Scripture.

1.    Isaiah lived in the eighth century BCE. At the time Isaiah began his ministry, pressure was placed upon Judah, the southern kingdom, by both Syria, and Israel, which is often referred to as Ephraim, the dominate tribe in the north, and whose capital was Samaria.

2.    Ahaz, the king of Judah was looking to Assyria, for an alliance and thus hoping Syria and Israel would be prevented from attacking. However, in 734 BCE they attacked anyway. This is the setting of events in a nutshell. We recall that after the death of Solomon, there was a civil type war and the nation of Israel was divided into the northern and southern kingdoms know as Judah in the south and Israel (or Ephraim) in the north.

3.    God sent Isaiah to King Ahaz in the though that due to the pending invasion, he would seek the Lord. But no, Ahaz decided not to “put the LORD to the test” and instead would depend on Syria and Israel for help.

4.    Therefore, as we read in verse 14, the LORD Himself would give a sign, a virgin, or Almah in Hebrew, would conceive an bear a son and His name would be Immanuel, which means, God with us.

5.    Almah can mean virgin, girl, and maiden in Hebrew. The Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible, the LXX or Septuagint, the word is parthenos, which clearly means a virgin female.

6.    The germ of this prophecy lies in Genesis 3:15: “I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring, he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his head.”

7.    Now turn in your Bible to the following passages and read how Isaiah’s prophecy was fulfilled: Matthew 1:18–25; Philippians 2:5–11; and Hebrews 1:1–4.

Cyprian: How it all went wrong

Cyprian, bishop of Carthage from 248 to 258, changed, and radically so, the face of Christianity. It is said he was a brilliant scholar, an excellent preacher/orator, and much admired by all. Yet it would take a little more than thirteen hundred years before a correction to Cyprian’s influence appeared.

Prior to and during the days of Cyprian, the Catholic (or universal) Church had been dealing, and for many years, with Marcionism, Gnosticism, and Montanism. The result was division and discord among Christians.

The bishop, pastor/overseer, became the dominant authority in the Church, which of course, bore no identity with the present Roman Catholic Church. There would be a bishop for a city or for an area, who had ultimate authority over the affairs of the Christian community.

A very severe persecution of Christians by the Emperor Decian began in 250. This Roman emperor’s edict demanded that sacrifices be made to the gods. (The Jews were exempted from doing so.) Initially Cyprian went into hiding and justified his actions saying the faithful Christians needed a pastor.

            Some Christians complied with the edit of Decius, others did not and were tortured by the Roman authorities if they did not confess, “Hail, Caesar”. It is said that the Decian persecution of Christians was the most severe of them all. This event divided the church into two groupings, those who compromised, or “lapsed”, and those who did not, known as  “confessors”. A bishop named Novatus or Novatian, refused to allow the lapsed back into the fellowship of the church. Cyprian sought for unity in the church.

Cyprian was able to create a middle ground between the two factions, which was well received by the majority of the believers. Novatian declared that any Christian who denied Jesus could never be restored. Cyprian challenged that position.

Later, as the persecution eased, Novatian’s views were considered a heresy. Cyprian ruled that sacraments received under Bishop Novatian were invalid and that only the sacraments given by the “true” church were able to save those who received them. Salvation then could only be given by true and legitimate bishops. It is here that the entire nature of the church underwent extreme change. Only the “Mother Church” could give saving sacraments.

In 251 Cyprian called together a council or synod of the church, at Carthage, for the purpose of developing unity. He read to the council a piece he had written titled “On the Unity of the Church.” His position was that there is only one Bride of Christ, as there is only one Christ, and the Bride is the church. And only in the church is their salvation.

            It was not enough that a Christian have a personal relationship with the Triune God, he or she needed the church. Since the Apostle Peter’s work centered, to some degree, in Rome, then the bishop of that church in Rome would be first among equals.

            Cyprian penned that, “Outside the church there is no salvation,” and, “Where the bishop is, there is the church,” and, “He cannot have God for His Father who has not the church for his mother.” It was understood that to be with the church one had to be with the bishop. One could not be a Christian if he or she was not with the bishop.

It would be the bishop alone who could determine church membership and salvation. The biblical teaching of the new birth by the working of the Holy Spirit was ignored. Cyprian taught that the Holy Spirit worked through the bishop. And this moved the bishops into a power position, and this occurred through the administration of the mass where the body and blood of Jesus was received by the authority of the bishop. The church then controlled salvation. This produced a divide between the clergy, ordained by the bishop, and the laity, or the people.

Cyprian was beheaded in 258 during a persecution directed by the Roman emperor Valerian because he refused to make a sacrifice to the pagan gods. Yet, the church of his time retained his views on the unity of the church based on the prominence and authority of the bishop. And again, the first amongst the bishops was the bishop of Rome.

As time wore on, Marcionism, Gnosticism, and Montanism receded into the background, yet the Catholic Church continued to grow and dominate the Christian landscape. The clergy, those ordained by the bishop, became a separate “order.” These were the bishops and the deacons. Below these were the minor orders, the sub-deacons, acolytes, exorcists, readers, and janitors. Deaconesses were to be found in the eastern part of the empire.

The bishop of Rome, the greater city, became the most authoritative office, and as the Church faced the complexities of the world, the Roman bishop accumulated power and authority.

During the course of Christianity in the world there would be individuals and movements who defied the authority of the Roman Church, but these movements did not significantly impact the Church until the early years of the sixteenth century with Martin Luther, John Calvin, and the other reformers.

Biblically speaking, the real Church is known only to God, which consists of all those born again of the Holy Spirit. Upon the very moment of conversion, each newborn Christian is placed by the Holy Spirit into the Body of Christ, the true Church. These true believers are found throughout the world in numbers of differing groups and denominations. Such will be found in the Roman Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Protestant denominations, the Charismatic/Pentecostal denominations, and other gatherings that have no labels or known identities.

At the return of Jesus, the timing of which is unknown, the Church on earth will be joined with the Church right now in the presence of God in heaven. And so we will be forever with the Lord.

Have you ever had a “bad” church experience?

Okay now, everyone here who has had a bad church experience, raise your hand.

Wow, that many!

Is that why you stay at home and watch your favorite preacher on television? Okay, how many identify?

That many! Wow!

Let’s go deeper. How many have just decided you will not risk it again? Show of hands.

That’s about what I thought. All I have been doing is checking to see if my hunch was on it or not. Could this be the reason 52% of Christians do not attend a brick and mortar church?

A little switcheroo here. The “bad” experience, what are these? Go ahead, just stand up and shout it out.

I felt humiliated when I got a phone call asking why I hadn’t fulfilled my pledge.

I wanted to sing in the choir but I guess I wasn’t good enough.

There was a lady there I wanted to date, but she reported me to the pastor. That was enough for me.

My Sunday school teacher said I asked too many questions.

A deacon told me I needed to come to prayer meeting and get my life straightened out.

I wanted to ask questions of the pastor but he would not talk to me.

When I was sick at home and could not come to church for weeks, no one called me.

A guy at church took me aside and tried to correct something I believed about hell. He told me I was on the wrong track and that I needed to repent.

I got to church late one Sunday and I got a lecture from the usher.

I got pressured to be baptized and I said I already had been. That was not good enough for them.

All right everybody, I will tell you about my bad church experiences, and I have had so many I don’t know where to start.

No I won’t do that, but as a pastor I have had my share, more than my share. I wonder sometimes why I even do this. You wouldn’t believe some of the stuff that came my way. At times I would be so discouraged I seriously did not want to even show up on Sunday morning. I did though because it was my job. How many of pastors I have known over the years who simply resigned and moved out of town.

How do I survive? For one thing, I found out long ago that we have an enemy, the accuser of the brethren. You know that passage don’t you. “We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places” (Ephesians 6:12).

It is a battle to be a Christian and if you are a leader in a church, watch out. Of course, the devil isn’t stupid: Satan strikes the preacher, the teacher, and anybody else he can get hold of. And such not in person but my means of some very fine people who ought to know better but, well, things happen. Christian leaders want to be super people, others expect this, but we are not and often struggle as anyone will.

That’s enough from me. Anyone else have something to say?

Can’t we just worship at home?

How about just go to church online?

Maybe come only on Communion Sunday and other special days?

It is just not convenient.

I have to arrange for rides to and from. Not always works for me.

I will run into people I hate to talk to.

It all takes too much time and energy.

I don’t like the choir, and worse, the preacher can’t preach.

You’ve pretty well summed it up. Each of you can find a reason to stay home. Indeed, it takes effort, strength, and courage for some of us to make it a worship service. I keep having that verse run through my mind, “For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them” (Matthew 18:20). There is something different about being in a group of folks who love Jesus and want to serve and worship their Lord.

Also, Jesus makes a special promise to those who gather for worship. In a way we do not understand, He is with us in a special way. I think our hearts are softened, our fears relaxed, our burdens lifted. Not only that, but we get to encourage others, too. We never know the impact we might have just being present.

Then I think of the fact that Christians have gathered together from day one. Sometimes under the threat of death and mayhem by godless rulers, both in that day and this.

Last thing I want to say: There are at least five people I know who would love to join with us for Sunday morning worship but are unable to, and due to one thing or another. Some of these watch online, and that is wonderful, yet there are those for whom even figuring out the techy issues is too much for them. How they would love to be with us.

Might you have a bad church experience? I would be shocked if you had not. It just goes with the territory. For as long as we have life and breath, let us gather together as often as we possibly can.

Isaiah’s Vision of the LORD and Isaiah’s Commission

Isaiah 6:1-13

Find a quiet place, alone and apart from distractions. Be comfortably alert, still, and at peace. Say the Lord’s Prayer. Sing or cant the Jesus Prayer. Pray for family, friends, neighbors, and yourself. Slowly and carefully read the passage of Scripture.

1.         Isaiah, about 740 BCE, has a vision wherein he saw the LORD (Yahweh) sitting on a throne, which is set in the most majestic sort of Temple, where he also saw seraphim, or flames, that had great power.

2.         The seraphim called to one another, “Holy, holy, holy is the LORD of hosts; the whole earth is full of his glory!” The holiness of God is set above all the glories of God and it is this holiness by which we know God.

3.         Isaiah then, beholding this incredible otherness cries out “Woe is me!” This is always the first experience we have when suddenly we behold the absolute holiness of God, which is intended to lead us to repentance as we behold the awfulness of our sin.

4.         Isaiah’s guilt and shame are removed by the burning coal delivered by a seraphim, that flame, that burns away and forever our sin: our sin is atoned for and completely taken away.

5.         Isaiah can now respond to the question, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?” (notice the plural “us”) Isaiah responds, “Here I am! Send me.”

6.         The LORD then provides the message Isaiah is to proclaim. Then He tells him his ministry will fail as no one, or very few, will listen and obey. Isaiah is shocked and asks how long will the rejection go on.

7.         The LORD’S answer is enigmatic, mysterious indeed, as to the question “how long” yet Isaiah learns that despite it all there will be what we call a remnant, or a tenth, that will emerge out of the devastation. This is the holy seed, which has been identified over the centuries as the real Israel, the Church called out and redeemed by God alone.