Thirty

On Helping Others

“Hello pastor, my children and I are at the Fireside

Motel and we are stuck. We’re trying to get to my

parent’s home in Portland and the car won’t work. We

haven’t eaten in two days and we’re out of money. Can

you help?”

“Kent, I need about $400 to pay the rent. I’ll be

glad to do some work around the church if I can have

the money.”

“Pastor, my neighbors are out of work and their

kids need food money. Do we have a benevolence

fund?”

Every pastor is familiar with requests like those

above. For the small church pastor, especially, these

are some of the most agonizing of all situations.

         

The subject of this chapter is how giving might be

a blessing and a ministry, not a curse. Here are a

few ideas on helping others.

Miller Avenue Baptist Church is located on Miller

Avenue in Mill Valley, one of the main streets of our

town (about 13,000 people). It is a busy street and I

keep the front door open. I open it up in the morning

140

For Pastors

and I close it in the evening. Anyone may come in and

pray and read the Bible. There is a small table in the

foyer with a rack that is generally filled with free

literature along with some Bibles.

Our building is small. My office can easily be seen

from the foyer; it has the word “Pastor” over the door.

The result is people will occasionally knock on my

office door hoping to receive some kind of assistance.

In times past we had a pastor’s or benevolence fund.

We put $50.00 a month into it. By the end of the first

week, generally, the fund was exhausted. If the church

committed $500.00 a month to a benevolence fund,

the money would be gone in a very short time.

Let me illustrate why I feel a benevolence fund is

problematic. The given: $50 (or whatever) to give out

each month. A person asks for some help because they

are in desperate trouble. The $50 is now gone. The

treasurer will not replenish the fund until the first part

of the coming month. Then another person comes in,

someone in the church for instance, and now the pastor

has to report that the money is gone. What suspicions

or feelings of rejection might be generated in the mind

of that member of the church family?

Our church council gives me permission to give

up to $100.00 away without their approval if there is a

genuine need. (I recently exceeded that amount and

got into some trouble.) But I do not like to have such

authority. It is so difficult to determine the authenticity

of a situation since there usually is no time or reliable

means to make inquiries. And certainly, there is no way

to run all of the requests for money though the church

council. If the council investigated all the requests for

benevolence, there would be little if any time left for

other matters.

141

On Helping Others

My solution is to only give my money away. I

generally have a five or ten-dollar bill, or maybe even

a twenty-dollar bill, in my desk that I can give. It is

very hard for me to give tithes and offerings to people

who could just as easily be telling me a story. But I will

give a little of my money away.

And I give it away; I do not make a loan. Giving a

loan, particularly to somebody in the church, is a first

class mistake! People, now in debt, have a cloud and a

burden hanging over them. Additionally, people who

get themselves into financial trouble often have that

need exist for quite some time—it is rarely a onetime

fix.

It has been my unhappy experience that a debtor

will leave the church with nothing more than a note

saying they will pay the money back as quickly as

possible. I’ve had that happen enough that I learned

not to loan money. When money is handed out to meet

a need, it should be a gift, whether the money is given

to a person in the church or to a stranger who knocks

on the door.

I don’t mind giving away a five or ten-dollar bill.

And I’ve heard everything: transmission broken down,

engine blown up, electricity turned off, no food in the

house, operation desperately needed, severe toothache,

on and on. My money is not going to make much of a

difference in such a case. I do have a list of

organizations, public and private, that may be able to

provide additional assistance. But I do not make a

judgement on the worthiness of the need. Even when

I think I am being taken, I will often hand over a fivedollar

bill.

Sometimes I must simply say to a person in need,

“I wish I could help”. And I mean those words; I wish

I could fix the world and make all the pain and suffering

142

For Pastors

go away. I am doing little more than taking note of the

person’s need and expressing the desire that if I could

I would do something to alleviate the problem.

I set aside roughly $50.00 a month of my own

money that I use for either offerings (giving to people

who ask for it) or I will buy things so I don’t have to go

to the treasurer all the time. Very few people know I

do this, but it has served me well for 15 years.

My favorite way of helping others is to do practical

things. Later I suggest that pastors have a pickup truck;

indeed, one of my specialties is moving and hauling

things with my truck. Sometimes a seemingly small

thing can be a great blessing. I recall a person who

needed to take dozens of plastic bags full of garbage

and other debris to the dump. The job, completed in

an hour, turned out to be a great time of fellowship.

Experienced pastors understand the “ministry of

presence”. Being there, only being present, is

sometimes the entire ministry that is needed, or

wanted. In my earlier years I was a persistent advice

giver. Now my aim is to avoid giving advice even when

it is asked for. All my supposed wisdom and profound

insight may serve only to get in the way and obscure

issues. My concern is to listen and reflect back what I

hear. Pastors are not therapists or social workers though

we dabble in both; it is better to be a loving and caring

friend who can lift needs up to the throne of God in

heartfelt prayer.

We will not be able to fill every need. The reality

is we may not be able to help even in desperate

situations. After we have done all we can we may yet

feel like we’ve failed. Hardly a week goes by but I am

confronted with a sense of inadequacy in the face of

human need. I can’t sell the building nor move

everyone into the parsonage. I am learning to face my

143

On Helping Others

limitations and, at the same time, not succumb to guilt

or despair. We will always have the poor and hurting

with us, and we will do our best for them, as we are

able.

         

It is probably clear that I am far from an expert when it

comes to human need.

Do you have ideas on how to strengthen this chapter,

perhaps some ideas on dealing with a sense of failure

and inadequacy when we have no resources?

   

Twenty-nine

On Being a Counselor

“Kent, remember what I told you about my mother.

You’ve got to promise me that you will never tell

another living soul. I’ll just die if you do.”

“I assure you, I will never mention it to anyone,

not even my wife.”

(One month later.)

“Kent, now my husband knows. You must have told

him because no one else knew. How could you? I’ll

never trust you again.”

         

My college major was psychology. I left a graduate

program in counseling to attend Golden Gate

Baptist Theological Seminary. It seemed natural

enough to combine pastoral ministry and counseling;

I perceived of myself as a pastor/counselor.

Following my involvement in the “Jesus

Movement” I developed a counseling ministry, in the

70’s particularly, called the Marin Christian Counseling

Center. Christian counseling was a subject of great

interest during that particular time and, of course, it

continues to be. As a pastor with counseling skills I

thought I would be able to help people overcome

136

For Pastors

emotional and spiritual based problems. For ten years

I spent four days a week with as many as six, seven,

sometimes eight appointments a day. All kinds of

people made appointments—people in the church,

people outside the church, Christians, and non-

Christians. I never charged a penny.

People would reveal their innermost secrets, deep

dark stuff, sometimes details of their lives they really

hadn’t intended to divulge; it would just come out. Too

often I would know way too much.

During the counseling process itself revelations of

past events did not seem to pose any threat. However,

I now had information that might prove damaging

should it get out. Even the closest relationships are

subject to strain, and sensitive, personal information

disclosed in a counseling situation may be problematic

once the strength of the counseling bond diminishes.

This is especially applicable for pastors who do indepth

(more than simple pastoral ministry) counseling

with members of the congregation.

I have discovered that when people go through a

life crisis and disclose intimate details of their lives,

though it seems okay at the time, when the crisis is

past, they may be embarrassed and uncomfortable in

the pastor’s presence. It may even be necessary for the

person to find another church. This has happened to

me more than once. Therefore, I have determined not

to be a counselor or confessor if I can avoid it.

People will confess their sins and if such repentance

arises naturally out of the Holy Spirit’s conviction, well

and good. But to set oneself up as a qualified counselor,

one ready to hear and handle the deep, dark,

complicated things—I think this is a mistake for the

pastor.

137

On Being a Councelor

We are called into the pastoral ministry not into

the work of the psychotherapist, analyst, or counselor.

When, however, someone lays a problem before me

and asks for advice or counsel I respond, “I am not a

counselor, I am not a therapist, and I receive no

compensation for counseling.” (I ought also to disclose

that I have neither a license nor malpractice insurance.)

It is not unusual for a person who is not a member

of my congregation to offer to pay me for my time. My

answer is: “There is no charge. If you want to make a

donation to the church, you can.” And I will only say

that if absolutely pressed. I prefer that no money

change hand at all.

Pastoral ministry is what I will do, however. I can

tell a person what the Scripture says about a particular

issue, I can pray with and for somebody, I can relate

some of the things I have learned in my life and

ministry, but beyond that I hope not to go. I will listen

carefully, I will actively share what I feel is helpful,

and I may be able to recommend someone who would

be better qualified and trained than myself.

And so it is that I don’t want to know too much

about an individual. I want to be the pastor/teacher. I

do not want to be the counselor. Pastoral psychology

and counseling are taught in our seminaries and Bible

colleges and I am not saying that is an error or wrong.

I’m saying simply that as a pastor I would rather not

engage in it.

As I have already stated, I get to know more than I

ever wanted to know acting as a counselor, but

secondly, it is an extraordinarily time-consuming

process. Not only does counseling require large blocks

of time, it is emotionally draining as well. To hear of

the pain, suffering, and grief of others is a difficult thing.

What is it that is said, “Psychiatrists have the highest

138

For Pastors

suicide rate of any profession.” Whether this is true or

not I don’t know, but I know there is an incredibly

high attrition rate for people who engage in

psychotherapeutic work.

The job of the pastoral minister is to preach the

gospel and help those who are converted to grow up

into the stature of the fullness of Jesus. And people

are to work out their own salvation with fear and

trembling. I don’t want to have a person develop a

relationship with me that they really need to have with

Jesus. I would rather have them view Jesus as their

counselor. Jesus is the Counselor, the Advocate, the

Paraclete, the One who comes alongside to help. I

would rather see an individual develop a strong

devotional life and learn to trust the Lord to be their

counselor. I am then free to be the pastor/teacher.

         

Do you want to function as a counselor?

Do you perceive a difference between pastoral

counsel and the counsel of a licensed therapist?

Have you experienced the betrayal of confidence?

 Psychic Empath

The Book titled, Psychic Empath: 5 Books in 1, published in 2021 by Spiritual Awakening Academy, with no author(s) named, claims to cover the following: 

Survival guide for Empaths, Become a Healer Instead of Absorbing Negative Energies, Development, Telepathy, Healing Mediumship, Mindfulness, Meditation, Aura Reading and Chakras 

Statements with slight changes made to fit the flow of this chapter are preceded by *. The authors’ responses to the content of this book are in this font. 

*“Empathy is said to be the ability to understand and share in the thoughts and emotions of another person” (p. 206). It involves putting oneself in another person’s shoes and seeing the world from the perspective of another person. 

On the face of it, this does seem to be a commendable undertaking, but there is a dangerous downside to all of this, which is the connection with occultic practices whereby a person is exposed to evil entities. This connection is established while in a passive, altered, or shamanistic state of consciousness, and once in this state, one is open to be invaded by demonic entities. 

*An empath is not simply a sympathetic person; empaths feel the emotions and thoughts of others as though they were their own. “A psychic empath is able to pick up another person’s pain without necessarily being told of it. Their psychic ability allows them to tune into the suffering of another person even when this may not be so obvious to those who rely on verbal and visual cues” (p. 207). This may be difficult for the empath, as they will be impacted by the other’s pain and suffering. And it is not enough to simply be a psychic empath; the goal is to be a psychic empath warrior. 

*It is said that an empath is born, not made, that their skills are genetic in 35 

nature, inherent in their DNA. Thus, it is not something that can be learned; one is an empath, or one is not. And this means being able to process the energy and feelings of other people. Such people, and since prehistoric times, were seen to be priests, priestesses, seers, mystics, and more. For instance, there was the Greek Oracle of Delphi, and during the Renaissance, in France there was Nostradamus. There was even a planet, newly discovered in the mid-1800s that was said to rule psychic energy. Some of the big names issuing from this period are Edgar Cayce, Daniel Dunglas Home, and Madame Blavatsky. 

Empath traits 

*Among the traits of an empath are the following: they are highly sensitive, even telepathic, have good luck, hate conflict, have high sensory stimulation, have keenly accurate instincts about other people, often have imaginary friends, appear lonely, have a past life, communicate with animals, are loving and compassionate, have sleep issues, are good at connecting dots, have trouble letting go, soak up other peoples’ energies, are introverted, are highly intuitive, take a long time to process emotions, love nature, have strong senses, are generous, and are creative. 

Empath categories 

*Then there are various categories of empaths. One is the geomantic empath, meaning they are connected to different sites, maybe buildings, lakes, oceans, or mountains. Then there is the physical empath, or medical empath, who can discern a person’s physical well-being. The emotional empath is sensitive to people’s emotional energy. The animal empath likes to keep company with animals and may develop ways to communicate with them. The plant empath is similar to the animal empath in that they can develop close connections with plants and may communicate with them. The precognitive empath will tend to see things before they happen. The psychometric empath will have deep connections to physical objects, maybe knives, jewelry, photos, and so on. The telepathic empath can know what is in another person’s mind. 

Are these telepathic traits simply human sensitivities, imaginary thinking, or a form of mental illness? Or, are they the result of spiritual entities that know the history of humans and reside within the empath—by that we mean demonic spirits. It has been our experience to see much of what has been mentioned about traits and categories to vanish after a person has experienced the casting out of demons through our Lord Jesus Christ. 

*Geomancy is said to be an ability that empaths have or develop whereby they sense the energies and vibrations of the earth. Thus, by dousing, also known as water witching, they can discover water within the earth. Or they may be able to predict the coming of bad weather or use psychometry—the psychic ability to obtain impressions from objects. 36 

*Some empaths are able to sense and work with various spirits, a psychic ability called mediumship. “Some can heal by feeling other people’s symptoms and help them by transmuting energies” (p. 222). 

*The history of psychic empaths stretches back to the beginning of human history. However, “it was only during the New Age Awakening of the [19]70s and [19]80s that empathic skills were recognized as being distinct from other psychics” (p. 223). 

Healing tools 

*There are several spiritual healing tools that an empath may use. One is prayer, of which the H’oponopono prayer is foremost. Some aspects of that prayer are (1) Repentance—saying you are sorry for the part you have played in the things you perceive as evil or problematic that are surrounding you; (2) Asking for forgiveness—from whatever higher power you sense; (3) Gratitude—saying thank you, which takes your focus off the negative, and saying it continuously; and (4) Love—which is the most powerful force in the universe, so say it over and over again. 

Developing other abilities 

*Learning how to develop one’s “third eye”, which is between the eyebrows, helps in picking up energetic signals, which helps the chakras open up and allows energy to flow more evenly. 

*And then making one’s connection with the spiritual world will help strengthen one’s mediumship, which is allowing spirits, or deceased loved ones, to speak through you. “Even a person with no psychic skills can stay in touch with his or her ‘angels.’. . . Plus, you can then help others connect with theirs. One warning however, one must be careful as those spirits who once were humans may not like to be bothered at any hour. So, nevertheless, you need to respect them” (p. 232). 

This so-called ability is evident in our culture today. So many hope to communicate with dead parents, children, brothers, sisters, friends, famous people, pets, etc., that it is becoming the chief form of the mediumistic experience. A Google search on related topics, such as mediums, channelers, or life coaches who use psychic techniques, will reveal how many there are who are offering these spiritistic opportunities. And nothing is contacted except entities in the demonic kingdom. The result is demon possession but no contact with deceased humans or animals. 

The Shamanic and The Mystical 

The author(s) state that “Shamanism and Mysticism are two completely different practices. They have different values, either that of empowerment or 37 

surrender” (p. 236). 

*First, shamanism sees all of humanity connected to one another, otherwise known as “the collective unconscious.” And shamanism is about power, and empaths follow the shamanic path, since they connect to anything around them at any given time. Empaths have power, therefore, to connect with that which is around them, whether it be other people, animals, objects, or the deceased. This is power. “Shamanic practices are ways to heal the earth, heal oneself or others, channeling and mediumship, as well as entering a state of trance for wisdom” (p. 237). 

*There are many signs that one might be a shaman, and the top five are (1) your ancestors were healers as well; (2) you have a strong connection with nature; (3) you do not fit in with others; (4) you are able to “read” people; and (5) you feel as though you are called to help and heal others. 

*The signs one might be a mystic are (1) you are not materialistic; (2) you do not need to follow the norms of society; (3) you prefer to be alone; (4) you can see right through people; and (5) you are not afraid of the future. 

Our view is that such distinctions are disingenuous and that there is so much that is shared by the shaman and the mystic. Chiefly among the commonalities are the trance state, that which is known as the passive or altered state of consciousness, plus willful and actual contact with other worldly entities, and the deception that those entities contacted are benign and helpful. Both shamanism and mysticism are only a short distance away from direct worship of the satanic kingdom, and because of this, some empaths who have psychic abilities will hide them for fear that others will think they are evil. 

*It is said of empaths and or psychics that they can sense the subtlest energy, can internalize the feelings of other people, and have trouble distinguishing someone else’s discomfort from their own. 

*There are a number of signs that one can know he or she has psychic skills: 

*(1) They have higher than average intuitive abilities. (2) They have visions regularly. (3) Dejavu, or the sense that one has known or seen something before, is a normal experience. (4) They have accurate gut feelings on a regular basis. (5) There are occurrences of telepathy, sending and receiving messages from other people. (6) They have vivid dreams. (7) They have a sense of knowing the history of objects and people. (8) They have premonitions and predictions. (9) They know when trouble is coming. (10) They feel events from far away. (11) They have healing abilities. (12) They have access to sounds when no one else does. 

The authors of the book are aware that not all embrace psychic abilities. 38 

“Religious leaders still disapprove psychic abilities. They always warn their parishioners about the evils of psychics. They write them off as frauds, devil worshippers, or con artists. And by doing so these religious leaders dismiss the fact that there are real psychic abilities” (p. 252). 

Then a list of the chief psychic abilities is presented. 

*The first is clairaudience, meaning clear hearing or receiving messages without using one’s actual ears. The second is clairvoyance, which is clear seeing, and this seeing is with the mind’s eye. The third is clairsentience, which is clear feeling. And it means one gets messages through emotions, feelings, and sensations. The fourth is clairgustance, meaning clear tasting, and results in tasting something before putting it into your mouth. The fifth is claircognizance, which means clear knowing. This allows one to know something without seeing any facts or information. The last is clairalience, which is clear smelling, and is the ability to smell beyond your normal ability. 

Clairvoyant Healing 

*Chapter eight on clairvoyant healing, also known as psychic healing, covers the basics of this form of healing. Essentially it is using one’s psychic power by sending someone healing energies. It is said to be a balancing and harmonizing of a person’s body energies and removing blockages to dissipate physical aches and pains. 

*Clairvoyance, the ability to see clearly, involving the third eye, lets the healer see the blockage of energy and then how to relieve the circumstances. This healing may be made “manifest” to the patient portraying them as healthy, happy, and mentally, physically, and spiritually well (p. 275). 

Clairvoyant healing is sometimes referred to as energy working. This is done by the healer going into a trace state and with the movement of their hands, soothing out, releasing, and directing energy. The question is, what is this “energy?” It is never actually defined, not in any of the materials we have read nor in videos we have viewed. There is no scientific evidence verifying the existence of such energies. It is based on ancient and modern Hindu beliefs having to do with chakras and kundalini energy. 

*Meditation is an essential means of such healing. Deep breathing is very important as well. In the meditative, mindfulness state, when the healer inhales, unhealthiness is drawn out of the person’s body. Then with every exhale, this bad energy is released into the universe to be changed into something positive. 

*A spirit guide may even give the healer advice on what the trouble is and how to deal with it. 

The psychic healer’s job, as it is understood, is to heal those physical ailments that have an emotional or mental origin. So, those trained in 39 

psychiatry and psychology are not necessary. It all has to do with moving out bad energy. 

*The clairvoyant healer is also said to be able to heal someone who isn’t near them; indeed, they could be quite far away (p. 278). 

*Learning how to be a clairvoyant healer may be practiced on a pet. And if the pet does not need healing, the healer can attempt to sense their energy, and by means of meditation, focus that the pet will be healthy. 

Aura and Aura Reading 

*An aura is said to be the magnetic field surrounding every living thing, and which is said to extend about three feet around every person. And because auras originate from a person’s chakras, the aura can reveal the cause of what ails a person. It is the energy created by the chakras that create the auras (p. 285). 

*One’s aura is their personal energy field, a reflection of their current state of being. Therefore, the aura must be well taken care of, much as one would care for the physical body. 

*The psychic healer, using whatever means, can then be aware of a person’s aura and understand how to make things right. And the chief means of this involves meditation and proper breathing techniques on the part of both the healer and the patient. 

Mediumship 

*Mediumship is different from psychic reading. What is the difference? “Someone who does psychic readings may not have mediumistic abilities, which are acting as a vessel and a bridge of communication between the spirit world and the world of the living – but all mediums have psychic abilities, as this is what they use to contact the spirits of the dead” (p. 288). 

*The medium, like the channeler, can communicate with those who have died and can convey messages to the living for them. The Ouija board is a form of mediumship as are the Tarot cards, since through these means the medium is connecting with or attempting to connect with spirits of the dead. 

“The forms of mediumship used by practicing mediums are when the spirit of the dead speaks through the medium, and when the medium receives messages clairvoyantly (or clairsentient, claircognizant, clairaudient) and relays the message to the living. Most often the medium is asked by a living person to try and contact and create a channel of communication with a dead loved one” (p.288). 

Let it be clear that a medium or channeler is not connecting with spirits of the dead. Some of these practitioners are fabricating things, but others, using real mediumship, are connecting with demonic sprits that are indwelling 40 

them. Indeed, it is a case of demonic possession. In the process of many if not most of these healing events, the ones who need the healing are then also invaded by demonic spirits. It is the worst of the worst. 

At the conclusion of this Psychic Empath chapter are a series of “myths” and “facts.” Myth number 11 is, “You can quit being an empath.” Fact number 11 is, “Being an empath is a life-long sentence.” And here is an actual true statement, unless that empath turns to Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior and has the indwelling demonic spirits cast out.

   

Twenty-eight

What Title to Use

“How shall we refer to you on the wedding

announcement?”

“I like ‘Most Holy Reverend Doctor’. It has a ring

to it don’t you think?”

         

Just what or who are we? The usual titles are

“reverend,” “minister,” or “pastor,” and some like

to use “Doctor” if they have an earned doctorate.

Though I have an earned doctorate, a DMin., (not an

academic, but practical degree) I do not use it. It sounds

pretentious. I reserve “Doctor” for medical doctors,

dentists, and other medical specialists. But I will use

the term, also, for university, college, or seminary

professors if they have an earned Ph.D. or Th.D., but

that is about it. I restrict my use of the title because I

noticed that I was too pleased with being called “Dr.

Philpott”.

One day I introduced myself as Doctor Philpott to

a small group that included a rather well known medical

doctor. The M.D. gave his name, Doctor so-and-so. It

embarrassed me. He intended, I felt, to embarrass me.

He knew my doctorate had something to do with

133

What Title to Use

theology, and he could, I think, sense the kind of selfimportant

way in which I announced myself. That was

the last time I pulled that. I do not use the title in the

Yellow Pages of the telephone book, and I do not use

the term on my stationary or my business card. I have

no quarrel with others who do use it, however.

“Pastor” is the designation I use. I do not like the

title “reverend” maybe because I do not feel very

reverent most of the time. And I do not know what

“reverend” means exactly except that it is a ministerial

designation. The term “minister” is appropriate. When

I sign a wedding document (at least the ceremonial

certificate) I declare that I am a “Minister of the

Gospel.”

Essentially my function is to pastor a church, so

that is the title I use. When I meet people for the first

time they often don’t know how to address me. I will

generally extend my hand and say, “My name is Kent

Philpott” thereby letting them know how I prefer to

be called. If people ask “How am I to introduce you?”

or “How am I to list you on the program?” I will say,

“After my name should read, ‘pastor.’” And if they

want more than that I say, “Pastor of Miller Avenue

Baptist Church.” But generally, upon introduction, I

give my full name without title.

The question comes up, “How are kids to refer to

you?” I may not have the right spin on this, but I just

introduce myself to them as “Kent”. If a parent wants

to say, “This is Pastor Philpott”, or “Pastor Kent”, or

“Reverend Philpott” I let it go at that. However parents

wants to instruct their child to refer to me I will accept.

I will not correct a child but will let them call me

anything they want to.

Robes, clerical robes—though not the subject of

this chapter, I do not want to come up with a separate

134

For Pastors

chapter about robes—deserve some comment. I have

worn robes yet never felt comfortable with them. One

Sunday morning I tripped on the stole on my way up

to the pulpit and thereby generated a chorus of giggles.

I would not mention this topic except that I have met

too many ministers who take what I consider to be too

great a delight in dressing up in robes and other

religious garments. Robes were developed in an era

when the office of minister was undergoing a transition

from servant to shaman, or servant to magician. Special

garments symbolized extra ordinary powers. That is

one theory anyway, and another is that robes help set

the ministry apart or call attention to the specialness

of Christian ministry. I have little objection to this latter

view, but clothes should not be what makes the

ministry special.

If a particular denomination or church traditionally

uses robes, fine, ignore what I have said here all the

while keeping in mind our tendency to think of

ourselves more highly than we ought.

         

What title do you prefer?

What does the old term, “puffed up” mean to you?