Hello Everyone, below are the links to our four television channels.
If you like them, or maybe on of them, please send on to others who might find some value in them/
Kent Philpott’s own channel with The Bible Study
Hello Everyone, below are the links to our four television channels.
If you like them, or maybe on of them, please send on to others who might find some value in them/
Kent Philpott’s own channel with The Bible Study
John 5:1–17
The Healing at the Pool on a Sabbath
The Gospel of John
John 4:27-45
Jesus and the Woman of Samaria, part 2
SOUL CONFUSION
Larry King Live on 16 March 1999 featured five panelists: Robert Thurman, professor of Buddhism Studies at Columbia University; Marianne Williamson, New Age author and spokesperson for the spiritistically channeled Course in Miracles; Rabbi David Aaron, expert on and proponent of Kabbalism, an occult/mystical/gnostic interpretation of Judaism; Deepak Chopra, charismatic spokesperson for a popular version of Hindu monistic thought; and Franklin Graham, head of Samaritans Purse, a Christian humanitarian organization and son of Billy Graham, the renowned American evangelist.
What is the soul?
Though these five differed on many points, they seemed to be able to reach a consensus when it came to an understanding of “soul”. In fact, Deepak Chopra voiced agreement with Graham’s understanding of the soul. We have long heard Billy Graham say words like the following; “You have a soul and it will go to heaven or hell when you die”. According to this idea, the soul is a mysterious, spiritual and immortal part of the human being that leaves the cold, dead body at death. Those on Larry King’s program who believed in some form of reincarnation, were able to agree together about the soul though, from their own traditions, they might have used other symbols to express the same thing. Due to a revival of Greek philosophy in the Fifth and Sixth Centuries AD, Greek dualism infiltrated the Christian church mainly through the work of Thomas Aquinas and his Summa Theologica, which became the fountainhead of Catholic theology throughout the Dark Ages. Greek dualistic thought posits the theory that the mind, spirit and soul are good, even divine, while on the other hand, the body, flesh and matter are bad, the depository of evil. So it was the soul that mattered, the soul that needed saving; the body was simply a temporary prison for the soul.
Soul and self
Confusion concerning the nature of the soul has a powerful influence among the people of Mill Valley where I minister at the Miller Avenue Baptist Church. Though the doctrine is not biblical, and is absent from the teaching of the early church, the idea that the soul is the focus of evangelistic efforts persists in many Christian traditions. Franklin Graham was concerned about the “soul”. He should have been concerned about the whole person, body, mind, soul and spirit. So many in my community believe in reincarnation, that Graham’s doctrine on the soul would not be troublesome for them. The soul? Well, they say, it needs purifying and experiences endless lifetimes anyway. These people do not like to think that they will be resurrected to stand before the judgment of God. “My soul” is one thing; “myself” is another.
Total resurrection
The biblical doctrine is one of bodily resurrection, not the floating away of an immortal soul. We are whole, integrated beings, though the Bible writers spoke variously of mind, heart, body, flesh, spirit and soul for the sake of emphasis. A person is all of these and more, a whole being responsible to God in the totality and indivisibility of his nature. What we are in total will be raised from the dead, either to eternal life or eternal death. We do not have immortality in and of ourselves. The truth of it is found in 1 Corinthians 15:53: “For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality”.
“Soul confusion” must be countered by the truth of the resurrection, even if it means parting from long established ways of thinking and preaching. Let us not give the unconverted comfort by implying that they only have some ethereal “soul” to be concerned about. They themselves may hear Jesus say, “I never knew YOU; depart from me, YE that work iniquity” (Matthew 7:23).
Kent Philpott
SOUL CONFUSION
Larry King Live on 16 March 1999 featured five panelists: Robert Thurman, professor of Buddhism Studies at Columbia University; Marianne Williamson, New Age author and spokesperson for the spiritistically channeled Course in Miracles; Rabbi David Aaron, expert on and proponent of Kabbalism, an occult/mystical/gnostic interpretation of Judaism; Deepak Chopra, charismatic spokesperson for a popular version of Hindu monistic thought; and Franklin Graham, head of Samaritans Purse, a Christian humanitarian organization and son of Billy Graham, the renowned American evangelist.
What is the soul?
Though these five differed on many points, they seemed to be able to reach a consensus when it came to an understanding of “soul”. In fact, Deepak Chopra voiced agreement with Graham’s understanding of the soul. We have long heard Billy Graham say words like the following; “You have a soul and it will go to heaven or hell when you die”. According to this idea, the soul is a mysterious, spiritual and immortal part of the human being that leaves the cold, dead body at death. Those on Larry King’s program who believed in some form of reincarnation, were able to agree together about the soul though, from their own traditions, they might have used other symbols to express the same thing. Due to a revival of Greek philosophy in the Fifth and Sixth Centuries AD, Greek dualism infiltrated the Christian church mainly through the work of Thomas Aquinas and his Summa Theologica, which became the fountainhead of Catholic theology throughout the Dark Ages. Greek dualistic thought posits the theory that the mind, spirit and soul are good, even divine, while on the other hand, the body, flesh and matter are bad, the depository of evil. So it was the soul that mattered, the soul that needed saving; the body was simply a temporary prison for the soul.
Soul and self
Confusion concerning the nature of the soul has a powerful influence among the people of Mill Valley where I minister at the Miller Avenue Baptist Church. Though the doctrine is not biblical, and is absent from the teaching of the early church, the idea that the soul is the focus of evangelistic efforts persists in many Christian traditions. Franklin Graham was concerned about the “soul”. He should have been concerned about the whole person, body, mind, soul and spirit. So many in my community believe in reincarnation, that Graham’s doctrine on the soul would not be troublesome for them. The soul? Well, they say, it needs purifying and experiences endless lifetimes anyway. These people do not like to think that they will be resurrected to stand before the judgment of God. “My soul” is one thing; “myself” is another.
Total resurrection
The biblical doctrine is one of bodily resurrection, not the floating away of an immortal soul. We are whole, integrated beings, though the Bible writers spoke variously of mind, heart, body, flesh, spirit and soul for the sake of emphasis. A person is all of these and more, a whole being responsible to God in the totality and indivisibility of his nature. What we are in total will be raised from the dead, either to eternal life or eternal death. We do not have immortality in and of ourselves. The truth of it is found in 1 Corinthians 15:53: “For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality”.
“Soul confusion” must be countered by the truth of the resurrection, even if it means parting from long established ways of thinking and preaching. Let us not give the unconverted comfort by implying that they only have some ethereal “soul” to be concerned about. They themselves may hear Jesus say, “I never knew YOU; depart from me, YE that work iniquity” (Matthew 7:23).
Kent Philpott
The Gospel of John
John 4:48–54
Jesus Heals an Official’s Son
John 4:1–26, part 1
Jesus and the Woman of Samaria
The Gospel of John # 9
John 3:22-36
John the Baptist Exalts Christ
THE NEW PAGANS
Pagans were the country folk (‘pagan’ means country dweller) who resisted organized religion and practiced ancient rituals and ceremonies. Their pre-Christian religion could be described as animism — the belief that everything is alive with natural or supernatural spirits.
The ancient pagans used magical enchantments, honored a myriad of gods and goddesses, and lived close to ‘mother earth’, which they tended to deify. Due to their somewhat bizarre beliefs and practices, which sometimes included devil worship, they were easily dismissed. But this is beginning to change.
Pagan spirituality
Many of today’s pagans reject supernaturalism, tending toward a ‘natural’ spirituality without systematic theology or dogma.
Modern paganism (or ‘neo-paganism’) includes a variety of spiritual practices, but they almost all share a respect for (even worship of) mother earth.
Neo-pagans are an eclectic bunch. Since the 1950s they have multiplied so rapidly that they could be the fastest growing religious group in the world. They have no single organization or doctrines, and many people embrace a neo-paganistic worldview without realizing it.
A surprising number of people I know could be described as neo-pagan, though they would be astonished if I said so. Others, however, have no problem with the identification.
Caring and ethical
My experience is that they are caring and ethical people, who live well and do well. They believe that all nature is sacred and therefore to be cared for. They speak of gods and goddesses — of the Egyptians, Greeks, and Druids, for example — as though they were real, all the while knowing they are not.
Some neo-pagans are attracted to the ‘Great Spirit’ that many American Indian tribes believe in. Many practice ancient, naturalistic, healing methods. They may be vegetarians and frequent stores that sell organic, health food products.
Their political stance is often radical, sometimes highly so, and focuses on the environment.
Live and let live
Neo-pagans will not reject me because of my Christianity and hold some of the beliefs that I do. However, they are mostly relativistic, allowing me my truth and holding to their own without worrying about the contradictions.
They are rarely quarrelsome and are not readily attracted to theological debate, preferring to ‘live and let live’.
Neo-pagans’ commitment to the earth, however, borders on pantheism. The earth becomes Gaia, the earth goddess. Their goal is to take care of mother earth so that mother earth will take care of them.
For many neo-pagans, a chimpanzee, a primitive microbe, and a human being all have equal rank and value. Humans, therefore, have no transcendence and are not made in the image of God.
All life is here and now, passing quickly never to return. Humans are simply, and temporarily, at the top of the food chain.
A natural spirituality
Neo-pagans are attracted to ritual and ceremony, observing the onset of the four seasons and special days like May Day. This ‘worship’ takes many forms, but a common goal is to escape from the normal state of consciousness.
Mind altering drugs, ceremonies and rituals may be used to achieve alternative states of consciousness, allowing them to access ‘higher spiritual planes’.
Neo-pagan spiritual leaders are not teachers as much as facilitators — of experiences that harmonize devotees with the flow of nature. It is a peaceful, meditative, simplistic religion with little dogma and no centralized authority.
It is just what many, fleeing the frenzy of modern life, are looking for.
The real Church?
From its establishment in the Fourth Century down to even this very day, the organized church has sought to crush paganism. Possibly millions of ‘witches’ were killed, many burned at the stake, and practitioners of the old ways went underground.
But today, in a technological age when people are out of touch with nature and themselves, neo-pagans are gaining a hearing. And there is some validity in what they say. I can see why many young adults spurn the church altogether.
However, for the most part they have little understanding of real Christianity. They could not so easily ignore it if they understood its true nature.
The God of the Bible
The God of the Bible is Creator of all that exists, yet he stands above the creation. Nevertheless, as the sustainer of all things, He is intimately involved with the material world in which we live.
God told the first humans that they were to care for the world and have dominion over it (Genesis 1:26). Of course, ‘dominion’ can be misinterpreted as freedom to exploit and ravage the environment, but this is not what it means.
God’s care and involvement were demonstrated most clearly when he took flesh and fellowshipped with humans in the person of his Son, Jesus Christ.
Jesus cared for those in need and in pain. He healed, fed, and freed needy people. And he suffered and died for sinners like us. His was and is the highest ethic.
Responsibilities
Mankind was given the right to live off the land but not to abuse it. As the only creatures made in the image of God, humans are responsible for the care of the earth. But making earth a goddess is idolatry.
The earth is not our mother. It is simply where we ‘live and move and have our being’.
Paul’s words to the Athenians in Acts 17 speak pointedly to the neopagan viewpoint and experience:
‘Men of Athens, I perceive that in every way you are very religious. For as I passed … I found also an altar with this inscription, “To an unknown god”. What therefore you worship as unknown, this I proclaim to you.
‘The God who made the world and everything in it, being Lord of heaven and earth, does not live in shrines made by man, nor is he served by human hands, as though he needed anything, since he himself gives to all men life and breath and everything.
‘And he made from one every nation of men to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their habitation, that they should seek God, and in the hope that they might feel after him and find him.
‘Yet he is not far from each one of us, for “In him we live and move and have our being”.’
A temporary abode
The earth is our home, made that way by God. And He remains deeply involved with his creation. God is personal, loving, and caring and, says Paul, intends us to seek after him — for this true and spiritual God of the Bible is knowable.
But the earth is temporary. Science is pretty much agreed that the universe will eventually either burn up or freeze out. The Bible is more specific:
‘But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a loud noise, and the elements will be dissolved with fire, and the earth and the works that are upon it will be burned up’ (2 Peter 3:10).
The ‘day of the Lord’ will usher in a new history and a new home — the paradise of God. The earth we know is filled with corruption and disease, but new heavens and a new earth await those who trust in Christ.
Duped
Neo-paganism can be dangerous. Seeking ‘higher levels of consciousness’ may instead bring devotees face to face with evil spirits through occult practices.
I have often wondered if it dawns on neo-pagans why they are so dependent on rituals and ceremonies — from spells to drumming, chanting and dancing. Is it not to induce altered states of consciousness? Are our minds so numbed by life that we have to manipulate and be manipulated?
Some neo-pagans recognize that they are connecting with spiritual entities — which they break down into good, neutral, and evil spirits.
The Bible, however, tells us there is only one Holy Spirit and the rest are neither good nor neutral. Neo-paganism is serious stuff — much more serious and even dangerous than most people realize.
Satisfying and peaceful
It is not difficult for me to understand the appeal of neo-paganism. Jesus talked about the cares of the world and the deceitfulness of riches choking the Word of God (Mark 4:19), while Paul warns against being ‘conformed to this world’ (Romans 12:2). Christianity has a rich history of simple living, including appreciation of the created order and harmony with it.
But in rejecting ‘the world’ and seeking tranquility, an undiscerning Christian can fall into the trap of deifying nature, just like the neopagan. Christian tranquility is found, not in communing with nature or in altered states of consciousness, but in knowing Jesus Christ.
Christians are free to live in the hubbub of the modern world or to retreat from it. But, either way, they are called to live first and foremost for the praise, worship, and service of Almighty God, Creator of heaven and earth.
Neo-paganism misses the mark. It boils down to worshipping the creation and rejecting the Creator — and that is a big mistake.
It may sweep up many who feel their environment is toxic and out of balance, but it is powerless to deliver what it promises — a satisfying and peaceful life lived in harmony with nature.
Only in Christ can we find both joy and peace and a proper relationship with this impermanent earth. The earth is our home for a while, but those who trust in Christ’s salvation have another home, eternal in the heavens, whose builder and maker is God.
Kent Philpott
December 2003
THE GOSPEL OF JOHN # 8
John 3:16-21
For God So Loved the World
JOHN’S GOSPEL MEDITATION # 7
You Must Be Born Again